Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24211047›Full record

ArticleIntensive & critical care nursing2014

Factors affecting stress experienced by surrogate decision makers for critically ill patients: implications for nursing practice.

Ellen Iverson, Aaron Celious, Carie R Kennedy, Erica Shehane, Alexander Eastman, Victoria Warren, Bradley D Freeman

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Intensive & critical care nursing, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
6.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 80 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Decision fatigue of surrogate decision-makers: a scoping review.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Navigating disagreement and conflict in the context of a brain-based definition of death.Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie · 2023
    Review
  12. End-of-life Care in the Intesive Care Unit and Nursing Roles in Communicating with Families.Journal of critical care medicine (Universitatea de Medicina si Farmacie din Targu-Mures) · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Mechanisms of defense in clinical ethics consultation.Medicine, health care, and philosophy · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ellen IversonDepartment of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA. Electronic address: elleni@chla.usc.edu.
Aaron CeliousDepartment of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Carie R KennedyDepartment of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Erica ShehaneDepartment of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Alexander EastmanDepartment of Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
Victoria WarrenDepartment of Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
Bradley D FreemanDepartment of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Children's Hospital of Los Angeles · USThe University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center · USWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

Establishing the Ethical Framework for Critical Care GeneticsR01GM080591 · NIGMS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI FREEMAN, BRADLEY D · 2008 to 2012
$2.5M
NIGMS NIH HHS 1 R01 GM080591NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM080591
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis study explores surrogate decision-makers' (SDMs) challenges making decisions related to the care of patients in critical care, to (1) characterise the SDM stress, (2) identify personal, social, care-related factors influencing stress and (3) consider implications of findings to improving critical care practice. METHODOLOGY: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with SDMs of critically ill patients receiving care in two tertiary care institutions. Transcripts were analysed using a grounded theory approach. Domains explored were: stress characteristics, stress mitigators, coping strategies, social networks, SDM decision-making role, decision-making concordance, knowledge of patient's preferences, experience with provider team, SDM-provider communication, patient outcome certainty. MAIN OUTCOMES: We interviewed 34 SDMs. Most were female and described long-term relationships with patients. SDMs described the strain of uncertain outcomes and decision-making without clear, consistent information from providers. Decision-making anxiety was buffered by SDMs' active engagement of social networks, faith and access to clear communication from providers.

conclusionStress is a very real factor influencing SDMs confidence and comfort making decisions. These findings suggest that stress can be minimised by improving communication between SDMs and medical providers. Nurses' central role in the ICU makes them uniquely poised to spearhead interventions to improve provider-SDM communication and reduce SDM decision-making anxiety.

Indexed as

Critical Care NursingCritical IllnessDecision MakingAdaptation, PsychologicalCaregiversClinical Nursing ResearchCommunicationFemaleHumansInterpersonal RelationsMaleStress, PsychologicalCritical illnessProvider-SDM communication, Qualitative data collectionSocial science researchSurrogate decision maker

Identifiers

PMID24211047
PMCPMC3946606
OpenAlexW2152981321

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.