Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24210613›Full record

ArticleCurrent biology : CB2013

A conserved Oct4/POUV-dependent network links adhesion and migration to progenitor maintenance.

Alessandra Livigni, Hanna Peradziryi, Alexei A Sharov, Gloryn Chia, Fella Hammachi, Rosa Portero Migueles, Woranop Sukparangsi, Salvatore Pernagallo, Mark Bradley, Jennifer Nichols and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current biology : CB, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Cadherins in early neural development.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2021
    Review
  9. Acellular Biologic Nipple-Areolar Complex Graft:Tissue engineering. Part A · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Alessandra LivigniMRC Centre for Regenerative Medicine, Institute for Stem Cell Research, School of Biological Sciences, 5 Little France Drive, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH16 4UU, UK.
Hanna PeradziryiThe Danish Stem Cell Centre (DanStem), University of Copenhagen, 3B Blegdamsvej, 2200 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Alexei A SharovLaboratory of Genetics, National Institute on Aging, NIH Biomedical Research Centre, 251 Bayview Boulevard, Suite 100, Baltimore, MD 21224, USA.
Gloryn ChiaWellcome Trust Centre for Stem Cell Research, University of Cambridge, Tennis Court Road, Cambridge CB2 1QR, UK.
Fella HammachiMRC Centre for Regenerative Medicine, Institute for Stem Cell Research, School of Biological Sciences, 5 Little France Drive, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH16 4UU, UK.
Rosa Portero MiguelesMRC Centre for Regenerative Medicine, Institute for Stem Cell Research, School of Biological Sciences, 5 Little France Drive, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH16 4UU, UK.
Woranop SukparangsiThe Danish Stem Cell Centre (DanStem), University of Copenhagen, 3B Blegdamsvej, 2200 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Salvatore PernagalloSchool of Chemistry, Joseph Black Building, King's Buildings, the University of Edinburgh, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JJ, UK.
Mark BradleySchool of Chemistry, Joseph Black Building, King's Buildings, the University of Edinburgh, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JJ, UK.
Jennifer NicholsWellcome Trust Centre for Stem Cell Research, University of Cambridge, Tennis Court Road, Cambridge CB2 1QR, UK.
Minoru S H KoLaboratory of Genetics, National Institute on Aging, NIH Biomedical Research Centre, 251 Bayview Boulevard, Suite 100, Baltimore, MD 21224, USA; Department of Systems Medicine, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 160, Japan.
Joshua M BrickmanMRC Centre for Regenerative Medicine, Institute for Stem Cell Research, School of Biological Sciences, 5 Little France Drive, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH16 4UU, UK; The Danish Stem Cell Centre (DanStem), University of Copenhagen, 3B Blegdamsvej, 2200 Copenhagen, Denmark. Electronic address: joshua.brickman@sund.ku.dk.
University of Edinburgh · GBUniversity of Copenhagen · DKNational Institute on Aging · USWellcome/MRC Cambridge Stem Cell Institute · GB

Funding

Development and maintenance of bioinformatics tools for mouse biologyZIAAG000702 · NIA · NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON AGING · PI SCHLESSINGER, DAVID · 2009 to 2016
$4.1M
Systematic analysis of gene regulatory networksZ01AG000656 · NIA · NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON AGING · PI KO, MINORU S · 1999 to 2008
$1.6M
Expression Profiling Of Mouse Embryonic Somatic Stem CeZ01AG000662 · NIA · NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON AGING · PI KO, MINORU S · 2001 to 2008
$1.1M
Intramural NIH HHS Z01 AG000656Intramural NIH HHS Z01 AG000662Medical Research Council G0701428Medical Research Council G0701429NIA NIH HHS Z01AG000656Wellcome Trust 079249
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe class V POU domain transcription factor Oct4 (Pou5f1) is a pivotal regulator of embryonic stem cell (ESC) self-renewal and reprogramming of somatic cells to induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells. Oct4 is also an important evolutionarily conserved regulator of progenitor cell differentiation during embryonic development.

resultsHere we examine the function of Oct4 homologs in Xenopus embryos and compare this to the role of Oct4 in maintaining mammalian embryo-derived stem cells. Based on a combination of expression profiling of Oct4/POUV-depleted Xenopus embryos and in silico analysis of existing mammalian Oct4 target data sets, we defined a set of evolutionary-conserved Oct4/POUV targets. Most of these targets were regulators of cell adhesion. This is consistent with Oct4/POUV phenotypes observed in the adherens junctions in Xenopus ectoderm, mouse embryonic, and epiblast stem cells. A number of these targets could rescue both Oct4/POUV phenotypes in cellular adhesion and multipotent progenitor cell maintenance, whereas expression of cadherins on their own could only transiently support adhesion and block differentiation in both ESC and Xenopus embryos.

conclusionsCurrently, the list of Oct4 transcriptional targets contains thousands of genes. Using evolutionary conservation, we identified a core set of functionally relevant factors that linked the maintenance of adhesion to Oct4/POUV. We found that the regulation of adhesion by the Oct4/POUV network occurred at both transcriptional and posttranslational levels and was required for pluripotency.

Indexed as

Gene Regulatory NetworksAdherens JunctionsAnimalsCadherinsCell AdhesionCell DifferentiationCell MovementCells, CulturedEctodermEmbryonic Stem CellsEmbryo, NonmammalianGastrulaGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalOctamer Transcription Factor-3Xenopus laevisXenopus ProteinsCadherinsOctamer Transcription Factor-3Pou5f1 protein, mouseXenopus Proteins

Identifiers

PMID24210613
PMCPMC4228055
OpenAlexW2086925671

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.