Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24210018›Full record

ArticleComparative medicine2013

Stage of the estrous cycle does not influence myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury in rats (Rattus norvegicus).

Chad R Frasier, David A Brown, Ruben C Sloan, Brian Hayes, Luke M Stewart, Hetal D Patel, Robert M Lust, Matthew D Rosenbaum

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Comparative medicine, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Chad R FrasierDepartment of Physiology, Brody School of Medicine, East Carolina University, Greenville, North Carolina, USA.
David A Brown
Ruben C Sloan
Brian Hayes
Luke M Stewart
Hetal D Patel
Robert M Lust
Matthew D Rosenbaum
East Carolina University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Even though cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of death for men and women, the vast majority of animal studies use male animals. Because female reproductive hormones have been associated with cardioprotective states, many investigators avoid using female animals because these hormones are cyclical and may introduce experimental variability. In addition, no studies have investigated the specific effects of the estrous cycle on cardiac ischemic injury. This study was conducted to determine whether the estrous cycle stage influences the susceptibility to ischemic injury in rat hearts. Estrous cycle stage was determined by using vaginal smear cytology, after which hearts underwent either in vivo (surgical) or ex vivo (isolated) ischemia-reperfusion injury. For in vivo studies, the left anterior coronary artery was ligated for 25 min of ischemia and subsequently released for 120 min of reperfusion. Infarct sizes were 42% ± 6%; 49% ± 4%; 40% ± 9%; 47% ± 9% of the zone-at-risk for rats in proestrus, estrus, metestrus, and diestrus, respectively. For ex vivo studies, isolated, perfused hearts underwent global ischemia and reperfusion for 25 and 120 min, respectively. Similar to our in vivo studies, the ex vivo rat model showed no significant differences in susceptibility to infarction or extent of cardiac arrhythmia according to estrous stage. To our knowledge, these studies provide the first direct evidence that the stage of estrous cycle does not significantly alter cardiac ischemia-reperfusion injury in rats.

Indexed as

Estrous CycleAnimalsDisease SusceptibilityFemaleHemodynamicsRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyReperfusion InjuryRodent Diseases

Identifiers

PMID24210018
PMCPMC3796752
OpenAlexW2201100902

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.