Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24209423›Full record

Trial reportBMC public health2013

Reducing office workers' sitting time: rationale and study design for the Stand Up Victoria cluster randomized trial.

David W Dunstan, Glen Wiesner, Elizabeth G Eakin, Maike Neuhaus, Neville Owen, Anthony D LaMontagne, Marj Moodie, Elisabeth A H Winkler, Brianna S Fjeldsoe, Sheleigh Lawler and 1 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC public health, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02894099 (Blood Glucose, Insulin Response and Inflammatory Markers in Sedentary Elderly During Prolonged Sitting Time Versus Intermittent Sitting Time), which is not on this map. Cited by 66 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
66citing papers in PubMed, 9 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02894099 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2015, after this paper: background citation

Blood Glucose, Insulin Response and Inflammatory Markers in Sedentary Elderly During Prolonged Sitting Time Versus Intermittent Sitting Time

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Sao PauloRan2015 to 2016Enrolled16ConditionsSedentary LifestyleArmsProlonged sitting time, PST+Light intensity Short bouts PA, PST+Moderate intensity Short bouts PA, PST+Moderate intensity Long bouts PA
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

66 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Workplace interventions for reducing sitting at work.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Workplace interventions for reducing sitting at work.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018
    Pooled it
  7. The Impact of Active Workstations on Workplace Productivity and Performance: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2018
    Pooled it
  8. Workplace interventions for reducing sitting at work.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016
    Pooled it
  9. Active workstations to fight sedentary behaviour.Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2014
    Pooled it
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. A Cost and Cost-Benefit Analysis of the Stand More AT Work (SMArT Work) Intervention.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Pre-existing low-back symptoms impact adversely on sitting time reduction in office workers.International archives of occupational and environmental health · 2017
    Trial
  20. Social ecological correlates of workplace sedentary behavior.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2017
    Trial

6 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

David W DunstanBaker IDI Heart and Diabetes Institute, Melbourne, Australia. david.dunstan@bakeridi.edu.au.
Glen Wiesner
Elizabeth G Eakin
Maike Neuhaus
Neville Owen
Anthony D LaMontagne
Marj Moodie
Elisabeth A H Winkler
Brianna S Fjeldsoe
Sheleigh Lawler
Genevieve N Healy

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundExcessive time spent in sedentary behaviours (sitting or lying with low energy expenditure) is associated with an increased risk for type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease and some cancers. Desk-based office workers typically accumulate high amounts of daily sitting time, often in prolonged unbroken bouts. The Stand Up Victoria study aims to determine whether a 3-month multi-component intervention in the office setting reduces workplace sitting, particularly prolonged, unbroken sitting time, and results in improvements in cardio-metabolic biomarkers and work-related outcomes, compared to usual practice. METHODS/

designA two-arm cluster-randomized controlled trial (RCT), with worksites as the unit of randomization, will be conducted in 16 worksites located in Victoria, Australia. Work units from one organisation (Department of Human Services, Australian Government) will be allocated to either the multi-component intervention (organisational, environmental [height-adjustable workstations], and individual behavioural strategies) or to a usual practice control group. The recruitment target is 160 participants (office-based workers aged 18-65 years and working at least 0.6 full time equivalent) per arm. At each assessment (0- [baseline], 3- [post intervention], and 12-months [follow-up]), objective measurement via the activPAL3 activity monitor will be used to assess workplace: sitting time (primary outcome); prolonged sitting time (sitting time accrued in bouts of ≥30 minutes); standing time; sit-to-stand transitions; and, moving time. Additional outcomes assessed will include: non-workplace activity; cardio-metabolic biomarkers and health indicators (including fasting glucose, lipids and insulin; anthropometric measures; blood pressure; and, musculoskeletal symptoms); and, work-related outcomes (presenteeism, absenteeism, productivity, work performance). Incremental cost-effectiveness and identification of both workplace and individual-level mediators and moderators of change will also be evaluated. DISCUSSION: Stand Up Victoria will be the first cluster-RCT to evaluate the effectiveness of a multi-component intervention aimed at reducing prolonged workplace sitting in office workers. Strengths include the objective measurement of activity and assessment of the intervention on markers of cardio-metabolic health. Health- and work-related benefits, as well as the cost-effectiveness of the intervention, will help to inform future occupational practice.

trial registrationACTRN1211000742976.

Indexed as

Sedentary BehaviorAdolescentAdultAgedCost-Benefit AnalysisFemaleHealth PromotionHealth StatusHumansMaleMiddle AgedOccupational HealthProgram EvaluationResearch DesignTime FactorsWorkplace

Identifiers

PMID24209423
PMCPMC3828481

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.