Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24206598›Full record

ReviewAdvances in chronic kidney disease2013

Applications of nanoparticles in the detection and treatment of kidney diseases.

Chris Brede, Vinod Labhasetwar

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Advances in chronic kidney disease, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Pharmaceutical nanotechnology: from the bench to the market.Future journal of pharmaceutical sciences · 2022
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Magnetic Iron Oxide Nanoparticles for Biomedical Applications.Current opinion in biomedical engineering · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Chris BredeDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Lerner Research Institute and Glickman Urologic and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH; and Department of Biomedical Engineering, Lerner Research Institute and Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH.
Vinod Labhasetwar

Funding

Drug Resistance In Cancer TherapyR01CA149359 · NCI · CLEVELAND CLINIC LERNER COM-CWRU · PI LABHASETWAR, VINOD D · 2010 to 2014
$2.0M
NCI NIH HHS 1R01CA149359NCI NIH HHS R01 CA149359
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nanoparticles have emerged in the medical field as a technology well suited for the diagnosis and treatment of various disease states. They have been heralded as efficacious in terms of improved therapeutic efficacy and reduction of treatment side effects in some cases. Various nanomaterials have been developed that can be tagged with targeting moieties as well as with drug delivery and imaging capability or a combination of both as a theranostic agent. These nanomaterials have been investigated for treatment and detection of various pathological conditions. The emphasis of this review is to demonstrate current research and clinical applications for nanoparticles in the diagnosis and treatment of kidney diseases.

Indexed as

AnimalsDrug Delivery SystemsHumansNanoparticlesRenal Insufficiency, ChronicKidney diseaseNanoparticlesReviewTargetingTreatment

Identifiers

PMID24206598
PMCPMC3824259

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.