Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24206578›Full record

Trial reportCancer science2014

Expression of CD56 is an unfavorable prognostic factor for acute promyelocytic leukemia with higher initial white blood cell counts.

Takaaki Ono, Akihiro Takeshita, Yuji Kishimoto, Hitoshi Kiyoi, Masaya Okada, Takahiro Yamauchi, Nobuhiko Emi, Kentaro Horikawa, Mitsuhiro Matsuda, Katsuji Shinagawa and 9 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical TrialRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Cancer science, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Prognostic value of CD56 in patients with acute myeloid leukemia: a meta-analysis.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2015
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 17 institutions in 2 countries.

Takaaki OnoDepartment of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Hamamatsu University, Hamamatsu, Japan.
Akihiro Takeshita
Yuji Kishimoto
Hitoshi Kiyoi
Masaya Okada
Takahiro Yamauchi
Nobuhiko Emi
Kentaro Horikawa
Mitsuhiro Matsuda
Katsuji Shinagawa
Fumihiko Monma
Shigeki Ohtake
Chiaki Nakaseko
Masatomo Takahashi
Yukihiko Kimura
Masako Iwanaga
Norio Asou
Tomoki Naoe
Japan Adult Leukemia Study Group
Nagoya University · JPChiba University Hospital · JPFujita Health University · JPHamamatsu University · JPHyogo Medical University · JPIn-Q-Tel · USJikei University School of Medicine · JPKanazawa University · JPKansai Medical University · JPKindai University · JPKumamoto University · JPMie University · JPOkayama University · JPSaitama Medical University · JPSt. Marianna University School of Medicine · JPTokyo Medical University · JPUniversity of Fukui · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Expression of CD56 has recently been introduced as one of the adverse prognostic factors in acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL). However, the clinical significance of CD56 antigen in APL has not been well elucidated. We assessed the clinical significance of CD56 antigen in 239 APL patients prospectively treated with all-trans retinoic acid and chemotherapy according to the Japan Adult Leukemia Study Group APL97 protocol. All patients were prospectively treated by the Japan Adult Leukemia Study Group APL97 protocol. The median follow-up period was 8.5 years. Positive CD56 expression was found in 23 APL patients (9.6%). Expression of CD56 was significantly associated with lower platelet count (P = 0.04), severe disseminated intravascular coagulation (P = 0.04), and coexpression of CD2 (P = 0.03), CD7 (P = 0.04), CD34 (P < 0.01) and/or human leukocyte antigen-DR (P < 0.01). Complete remission rate and overall survival were not different between the two groups. However, cumulative incidence of relapse and event-free survival (EFS) showed an inferior trend in CD56(+) APL (P = 0.08 and P = 0.08, respectively). Among patients with initial white blood cell counts of 3.0 × 10(9)/L or more, EFS and cumulative incidence of relapse in CD56(+) APL were significantly worse (30.8% vs 63.6%, P = 0.008, and 53.8% vs 28.9%, P = 0.03, respectively), and in multivariate analysis, CD56 expression was an unfavorable prognostic factor for EFS (P = 0.04). In conclusion, for APL with higher initial white blood cell counts, CD56 expression should be regarded as an unfavorable prognostic factor.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCD56 AntigenCytarabineDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleHumansIdarubicinLeukemia, Promyelocytic, AcuteLeukocyte CountMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPlatelet CountCD56 AntigenCytarabineIdarubicinNCAM1 protein, humanTretinoinAcute promyelocytic leukemiaall‐trans retinoic acidCD56 expressionchemotherapyprognostic factor

Identifiers

PMID24206578
PMCPMC4317869
OpenAlexW2069138880

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.