Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24205318›Full record

ArticlePloS one2013

Health care professionals' views on discussing sexual wellbeing with patients who have had a stroke: a qualitative study.

Ruth M Mellor, Sheila M Greenfield, George Dowswell, James P Sheppard, Tom Quinn, Richard J McManus

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Let's talk about sex: older people's views on the recognition of sexuality and sexual health in the health-care setting.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2016
    Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ruth M MellorPrimary Care Clinical Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Sheila M Greenfield
George Dowswell
James P Sheppard
Tom Quinn
Richard J McManus

Funding

Department of Health CDF/01/017Department of Health NIHR-RP-02-12-015
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo examine the experiences of health care professionals discussing sexual wellbeing with patients who have had a stroke.

designIn-depth qualitative interview study with purposive sampling and thematic analysis.

participants30 health care professionals purposively recruited to include different roles and settings along the stroke patient pathway in secondary and primary care.

settingTwo hospitals and three general practices in the West Midlands, UK.

resultsSexual wellbeing was a topic that participants did not raise with patients and was infrequently raised by patients. Barriers to raising discussion were on four levels: structural, health care professional, patient, and professional-patient interface. Barriers within these levels included: sexual wellbeing not present within hospital stroke policy; the perception that sexual wellbeing was not within participants' role; participants' concern that raising the issue could cause harm to the patient; and the views that discussion would be inappropriate with older people or unimportant to women. Resources exist to aid discussion but many participants were unaware of them, and most of those that were, did not use them routinely.

conclusionsParticipants lacked motivation, ownership, and the confidence and skills to raise sexual wellbeing routinely after stroke. Similar findings have been reported in cancer care and other taboo subjects such as incontinence potentially resulting in a sub-optimal experience for patients. Normalisation of the inclusion of sensitive topics in discussions post-stroke does not seem to need significant structural intervention and simple changes such as information provision and legitimisation through consideration of the issue in standard care policies may be all that is required. The experiences recounted by professionals in this study suggest that such changes are needed now.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelHealth PersonnelReproductive HealthStrokeFemaleHealth ResourcesHumansMale

Identifiers

PMID24205318
PMCPMC3812130

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.