ArticlePloS one2013
Genomic and transcriptional alterations in lung adenocarcinoma in relation to EGFR and KRAS mutation status.
Article in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- N-glycans in lung tissue specimens: a prospective target for enhanced cancer diagnosis and prognosis.Journal of translational medicine · 2025Article
- Spatial distribution of tertiary lymphoid structures in the molecular and clinical context of non-small cell lung cancer.Cellular oncology (Dordrecht, Netherlands) · 2025Article
- Differential expression analysis of genes and long non-coding RNAs associated with KRAS mutation in colorectal cancer cells.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Prognostic Significance of the Loss of Heterozygosity ofFrontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- SRIQ clustering: A fusion of Random Forest, QT clustering, and KNN concepts.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2022Article
- Whole genome copy number analyses reveal a highly aberrant genome in TP53 mutant lung adenocarcinoma tumors.BMC cancer · 2021Article
- Transcriptome Based Estrogen Related Genes Biomarkers for Diagnosis and Prognosis in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer.Frontiers in genetics · 2021Article
- N-Glycan profiling of lung adenocarcinoma in patients at different stages of disease.Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc · 2020Article
- Modulation of proliferation factors in lung adenocarcinoma with an analysis of the transcriptional consequences of genomic EGFR activation.Oncotarget · 2019Article
- Integrating genetic mutations and expression profiles for survival prediction of lung adenocarcinoma.Thoracic cancer · 2019Article
- Elucidating the genomic architecture of Asian EGFR-mutant lung adenocarcinoma through multi-region exome sequencing.Nature communications · 2018Article
- Consensus of gene expression phenotypes and prognostic risk predictors in primary lung adenocarcinoma.Oncotarget · 2016Article
- An integrated genomics analysis of epigenetic subtypes in human breast tumors links DNA methylation patterns to chromatin states in normal mammary cells.Breast cancer research : BCR · 2016Article
- Intrinsic cancer subtypes--next steps into personalized medicine.Cellular oncology (Dordrecht, Netherlands) · 2015Review
- Robust selection of cancer survival signatures from high-throughput genomic data using two-fold subsampling.PloS one · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionIn lung adenocarcinoma, the mutational spectrum is dominated by EGFR and KRAS mutations. Improved knowledge about genomic and transcriptional alterations in and between mutation-defined subgroups may identify genes involved in disease development or progression.
methodsGenomic profiles from 457 adenocarcinomas, including 113 EGFR-mutated, 134 KRAS-mutated and 210 EGFR and KRAS-wild type tumors (EGFRwt/KRASwt), and gene expression profiles from 914 adenocarcinomas, including 309 EGFR-mutated, 192 KRAS-mutated, and 413 EGFRwt/KRASwt tumors, were assembled from different repositories. Genomic and transcriptional differences between the three mutational groups were analyzed by both supervised and unsupervised methods.
resultsEGFR-mutated adenocarcinomas displayed a larger number of copy number alterations and recurrent amplifications, a higher fraction of total loss-of-heterozygosity, higher genomic complexity, and a more distinct expression pattern than EGFR-wild type adenocarcinomas. Several of these differences were also consistent when the three mutational groups were stratified by stage, gender and smoking status. Specific copy number alterations were associated with mutation status, predominantly including regions of gain with the highest frequency in EGFR-mutated tumors. Differential regions included both large and small regions of gain on 1p, 5q34-q35.3, 7p, 7q11.21, 12p12.1, 16p, and 21q, and losses on 6q16.3-q21, 8p, and 9p, with 20-40% frequency differences between the mutational groups. Supervised gene expression analyses identified 96 consistently differentially expressed genes between the mutational groups, and together with unsupervised analyses these analyses highlighted the difficulty in broadly resolving the three mutational groups into distinct transcriptional entities.
conclusionsWe provide a comprehensive overview of the genomic and transcriptional landscape in lung adenocarcinoma stratified by EGFR and KRAS mutations. Our analyses suggest that the overall genomic and transcriptional landscape of lung adenocarcinoma is affected, but only to a minor extent, by EGFR and KRAS mutation status.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.