Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24205158›Full record

ArticlePloS one2013

Reducing the standard deviation in multiple-assay experiments where the variation matters but the absolute value does not.

Pablo Echenique-Robba, María Alejandra Nelo-Bazán, José A Carrodeguas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Pablo Echenique-RobbaInstituto de Química Física Rocasolano, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, Madrid, Spain ; Instituto de Biocomputación y Física de Sistemas Complejos, Universidad de Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain ; Zaragoza Scientific Center for Advanced Modeling, Universidad de Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain ; Departamento de Fsica Teórica, Universidad de Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain ; Unidad Asociada IQFR-BIFI, Madrid-Zaragoza, Spain.
María Alejandra Nelo-Bazán
José A Carrodeguas

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

When the value of a quantity x for a number of systems (cells, molecules, people, chunks of metal, DNA vectors, so on) is measured and the aim is to replicate the whole set again for different trials or assays, despite the efforts for a near-equal design, scientists might often obtain quite different measurements. As a consequence, some systems' averages present standard deviations that are too large to render statistically significant results. This work presents a novel correction method of a very low mathematical and numerical complexity that can reduce the standard deviation of such results and increase their statistical significance. Two conditions are to be met: the inter-system variations of x matter while its absolute value does not, and a similar tendency in the values of x must be present in the different assays (or in other words, the results corresponding to different assays must present a high linear correlation). We demonstrate the improvements this method offers with a cell biology experiment, but it can definitely be applied to any problem that conforms to the described structure and requirements and in any quantitative scientific field that deals with data subject to uncertainty.

Indexed as

Biological AssayGene Regulatory NetworksHumansMembrane ProteinsMitochondrial ProteinsMembrane ProteinsMitochondrial ProteinsMTCH1 protein, human

Identifiers

PMID24205158
PMCPMC3813515

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.