Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24205018›Full record

ArticlePloS one2013

Changes in sensitivity of reward and motor behavior to dopaminergic, glutamatergic, and cholinergic drugs in a mouse model of fragile X syndrome.

Eric W Fish, Michael C Krouse, Sierra J Stringfield, Jeffrey F Diberto, J Elliott Robinson, C J Malanga

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Parallel learning and cognitive flexibility impairments betweenFrontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Electromyographic evidence in support of a knock-in mouse model of DYT1 Dystonia.Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society · 2016
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Eric W FishDepartment of Neurology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America.
Michael C Krouse
Sierra J Stringfield
Jeffrey F Diberto
J Elliott Robinson
C J Malanga
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

Mechanisms of Alcohol Reward in a Humanized OPRM1 Mouse ModelF30AA021312 · NIAAA · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI ROBINSON, JOHN ELLIOTT · 2012 to 2016
$149k
NIAAA NIH HHS F30 AA021312
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fragile X syndrome (FXS) is a leading cause of intellectual disability. FXS is caused by loss of function of the FMR1 gene, and mice in which Fmr1 has been inactivated have been used extensively as a preclinical model for FXS. We investigated the behavioral pharmacology of drugs acting through dopaminergic, glutamatergic, and cholinergic systems in fragile X (Fmr1 (-/Y)) mice with intracranial self-stimulation (ICSS) and locomotor activity measurements. We also measured brain expression of tyrosine hydroxylase (TH), the rate-limiting enzyme in dopamine biosynthesis. Fmr1 (-/Y) mice were more sensitive than wild type mice to the rewarding effects of cocaine, but less sensitive to its locomotor stimulating effects. Anhedonic but not motor depressant effects of the atypical neuroleptic, aripiprazole, were reduced in Fmr1 (-/Y) mice. The mGluR5-selective antagonist, 6-methyl-2-(phenylethynyl)pyridine (MPEP), was more rewarding and the preferential M1 antagonist, trihexyphenidyl, was less rewarding in Fmr1 (-/Y) than wild type mice. Motor stimulation by MPEP was unchanged, but stimulation by trihexyphenidyl was markedly increased, in Fmr1 (-/Y) mice. Numbers of midbrain TH+ neurons in the ventral tegmental area were unchanged, but were lower in the substantia nigra of Fmr1 (-/Y) mice, although no changes in TH levels were found in their forebrain targets. The data are discussed in the context of known changes in the synaptic physiology and pharmacology of limbic motor systems in the Fmr1 (-/Y) mouse model. Preclinical findings suggest that drugs acting through multiple neurotransmitter systems may be necessary to fully address abnormal behaviors in individuals with FXS.

Indexed as

Disease Models, AnimalRewardAnimalsAntipsychotic AgentsAripiprazoleBehavior, AnimalBlotting, WesternCocaineDopamine Uptake InhibitorsExcitatory Amino Acid AntagonistsFragile X Messenger Ribonucleoprotein 1Fragile X SyndromeImmunoenzyme TechniquesMaleMiceMice, Knockout6-methyl-2-(phenylethynyl)pyridineAntipsychotic AgentsAripiprazoleCocaineDopamine Uptake InhibitorsExcitatory Amino Acid AntagonistsFmr1 protein, mouseFragile X Messenger Ribonucleoprotein 1Muscarinic AntagonistsPiperazinesPyridinesQuinolonesReceptor, Metabotropic Glutamate 5TrihexyphenidylTyrosine 3-Monooxygenase

Identifiers

PMID24205018
PMCPMC3799757
OpenAlexW2004390372

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.