Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24204856›Full record

ArticlePloS one2013

Incidence rate of needlestick and sharps injuries in 67 Japanese hospitals: a national surveillance study.

Toru Yoshikawa, Koji Wada, Jong Ja Lee, Toshihiro Mitsuda, Kiyoshi Kidouchi, Hitomi Kurosu, Yuji Morisawa, Mayumi Aminaka, Takashi Okubo, Satoshi Kimura and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Occupational exposure to blood and body fluids among primary healthcare workers in Johannesburg health district: High rate of underreporting.South African family practice : official journal of the South African Academy of Family Practice/Primary Care · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 10 institutions in 1 country.

Toru YoshikawaDepartment of Research, The Institute for Science of Labour, Kawasaki, Japan.
Koji Wada
Jong Ja Lee
Toshihiro Mitsuda
Kiyoshi Kidouchi
Hitomi Kurosu
Yuji Morisawa
Mayumi Aminaka
Takashi Okubo
Satoshi Kimura
Kyoji Moriya
Tokyo Health Care University · JPEbara Hospital · JPJichi Medical University Hospital · JPKani Tono Hospital · JPKobe University Hospital · JPNational Center for Global Health and Medicine · JPNational College Of Nursing · JPOhara Memorial Institute for Science of Labour · JPThe University of Tokyo · JPYokohama City University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDetermining incidence rates of needlestick and sharps injuries (NSIs) using data from multiple hospitals may help hospitals to compare their in-house data with national averages and thereby institute relevant measures to minimize NSIs. We aimed to determine the incidence rate of NSIs using the nationwide EPINet surveillance system. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL

findingsData were analyzed from 5,463 cases collected between April 2009 and March 2011 from 67 Japanese HIV/AIDS referral hospitals that participated in EPINet-Japan. The NSI incidence rate was calculated as the annual number of cases with NSIs per 100 occupied beds, according to the demographic characteristics of the injured person, place, timing, device, and the patients' infectious status. The NSI incidence rates according to hospital size were analyzed by a non-parametric test of trend. The mean number of cases with NSIs per 100 occupied beds per year was 4.8 (95% confidence interval, 4.1-5.6) for 25 hospitals with 399 or fewer beds, 6.7 (5.9-7.4) for 24 hospitals with 400-799 beds, and 7.6 (6.7-8.5) for 18 hospitals with 800 or more beds (p-trend<0.01). NSIs frequently occurred in health care workers in their 20 s; the NSI incidence rate for this age group was 2.1 (1.6-2.5) for hospitals having 399 or fewer beds, 3.5 (3.0-4.1) for hospitals with 400-799 beds, and 4.5 (3.9-5.0) for hospitals with 800 or more beds (p-trend<0.01). CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: The incidence rate of NSIs tended to be higher for larger hospitals and in workers aged less than 40 years; injury occurrence was more likely to occur in places such as patient rooms and operating rooms. Application of the NSI incidence rates by hospital size, as a benchmark, could allow individual hospitals to compare their NSI incidence rates with those of other institutions, which could facilitate the development of adequate control strategies.

Indexed as

AdultHospitalsHumansIncidenceJapanMiddle AgedNeedlestick InjuriesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID24204856
PMCPMC3813677
OpenAlexW2045616797

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.