Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24204795›Full record

ArticlePloS one2013

PathogenFinder--distinguishing friend from foe using bacterial whole genome sequence data.

Salvatore Cosentino, Mette Voldby Larsen, Frank Møller Aarestrup, Ole Lund

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 477 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
477citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

477 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Whole-genome sequencing of a multidrug resistantMicrobiology resource announcements · 2026
    Article
  3. Draft genome sequence ofMicrobiology resource announcements · 2026
    Article
  4. Draft genome sequence ofMicrobiology resource announcements · 2026
    Article
  5. Draft genome sequence ofMicrobiology resource announcements · 2026
    Article
  6. Draft genome sequence ofMicrobiology resource announcements · 2026
    Article
  7. Draft genome sequence ofMicrobiology resource announcements · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Draft genome sequence of multidrug-resistantMicrobiology resource announcements · 2026
    Article
  12. Draft genome sequence ofMicrobiology resource announcements · 2026
    Article
  13. Draft genome sequence of an alkaliphilic drug-resistantMicrobiology resource announcements · 2026
    Article
  14. Draft genome sequence of a clinicalMicrobiology resource announcements · 2026
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Draft genomes of two multidrug-resistantMicrobiology resource announcements · 2026
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Draft genome sequence ofMicrobiology resource announcements · 2026
    Article

417 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Salvatore CosentinoCenter for Biological Sequence Analysis, Department of Systems Biology, Technical University of Denmark, Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark.
Mette Voldby Larsen
Frank Møller Aarestrup
Ole Lund

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although the majority of bacteria are harmless or even beneficial to their host, others are highly virulent and can cause serious diseases, and even death. Due to the constantly decreasing cost of high-throughput sequencing there are now many completely sequenced genomes available from both human pathogenic and innocuous strains. The data can be used to identify gene families that correlate with pathogenicity and to develop tools to predict the pathogenicity of newly sequenced strains, investigations that previously were mainly done by means of more expensive and time consuming experimental approaches. We describe PathogenFinder (http://cge.cbs.dtu.dk/services/PathogenFinder/), a web-server for the prediction of bacterial pathogenicity by analysing the input proteome, genome, or raw reads provided by the user. The method relies on groups of proteins, created without regard to their annotated function or known involvement in pathogenicity. The method has been built to work with all taxonomic groups of bacteria and using the entire training-set, achieved an accuracy of 88.6% on an independent test-set, by correctly classifying 398 out of 449 completely sequenced bacteria. The approach here proposed is not biased on sets of genes known to be associated with pathogenicity, thus the approach could aid the discovery of novel pathogenicity factors. Furthermore the pathogenicity prediction web-server could be used to isolate the potential pathogenic features of both known and unknown strains.

Indexed as

Genome, BacterialSoftwareAlgorithmsBacteriaBacterial ProteinsHumansModels, GeneticMultigene FamilyVirulence FactorsBacterial ProteinsVirulence Factors

Identifiers

PMID24204795
PMCPMC3810466

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.