Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24204774›Full record

ArticlePloS one2013

The syncytial Drosophila embryo as a mechanically excitable medium.

Timon Idema, Julien O Dubuis, Louis Kang, M Lisa Manning, Philip C Nelson, Tom C Lubensky, Andrea J Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Waves in Embryonic Development.Annual review of biophysics · 2022
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The Rise of Ultrafast Waves.Developmental cell · 2018
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Chemical waves in cell and developmental biology.The Journal of cell biology · 2018
    Review
  9. Mitotic waves in the early embryogenesis ofProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Measuring time during early embryonic development.Seminars in cell & developmental biology · 2016
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Scaling laws governing stochastic growth and division of single bacterial cells.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2014
    Article
  16. Organization of early frog embryos by chemical waves emanating from centrosomes.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2014
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. A new way of tracking motion, shape, and divisions.European biophysics journal : EBJ · 2013
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Timon IdemaDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Julien O Dubuis
Louis Kang
M Lisa Manning
Philip C Nelson
Tom C Lubensky
Andrea J Liu

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mitosis in the early syncytial Drosophila embryo is highly correlated in space and time, as manifested in mitotic wavefronts that propagate across the embryo. In this paper we investigate the idea that the embryo can be considered a mechanically-excitable medium, and that mitotic wavefronts can be understood as nonlinear wavefronts that propagate through this medium. We study the wavefronts via both image analysis of confocal microscopy videos and theoretical models. We find that the mitotic waves travel across the embryo at a well-defined speed that decreases with replication cycle. We find two markers of the wavefront in each cycle, corresponding to the onsets of metaphase and anaphase. Each of these onsets is followed by displacements of the nuclei that obey the same wavefront pattern. To understand the mitotic wavefronts theoretically we analyze wavefront propagation in excitable media. We study two classes of models, one with biochemical signaling and one with mechanical signaling. We find that the dependence of wavefront speed on cycle number is most naturally explained by mechanical signaling, and that the entire process suggests a scenario in which biochemical and mechanical signaling are coupled.

Indexed as

AnaphaseAnimalsBiomechanical PhenomenaDrosophila melanogasterEmbryo, NonmammalianMechanotransduction, CellularMetaphaseMicroscopy, ConfocalModels, BiologicalVideo Recording

Identifiers

PMID24204774
PMCPMC3813724

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.