Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24204751›Full record

ArticlePloS one2013

In vivo readout of CFTR function: ratiometric measurement of CFTR-dependent secretion by individual, identifiable human sweat glands.

Jeffrey J Wine, Jessica E Char, Jonathan Chen, Hyung-Ju Cho, Colleen Dunn, Eric Frisbee, Nam Soo Joo, Carlos Milla, Sara E Modlin, Il-Ho Park and 4 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Assays of CFTR Function In Vitro, Ex Vivo and In Vivo.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jeffrey J WineCystic Fibrosis Research Laboratory, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States of America ; Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, United States of America ; Department of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States of America.
Jessica E Char
Jonathan Chen
Hyung-Ju Cho
Colleen Dunn
Eric Frisbee
Nam Soo Joo
Carlos Milla
Sara E Modlin
Il-Ho Park
Ewart A C Thomas
Kim V Tran
Rohan Verma
Marlene H Wolfe
Stanford University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To assess CFTR function in vivo, we developed a bioassay that monitors and compares CFTR-dependent and CFTR-independent sweat secretion in parallel for multiple (~50) individual, identified glands in each subject. Sweating was stimulated by intradermally injected agonists and quantified by optically measuring spherical sweat bubbles in an oil-layer that contained dispersed, water soluble dye particles that partitioned into the sweat bubbles, making them highly visible. CFTR-independent secretion (M-sweat) was stimulated with methacholine, which binds to muscarinic receptors and elevates cytosolic calcium. CFTR-dependent secretion (C-sweat) was stimulated with a β-adrenergic cocktail that elevates cytosolic cAMP while blocking muscarinic receptors. A C-sweat/M-sweat ratio was determined on a gland-by-gland basis to compensate for differences unrelated to CFTR function, such as gland size. The average ratio provides an approximately linear readout of CFTR function: the heterozygote ratio is ~0.5 the control ratio and for CF subjects the ratio is zero. During assay development, we measured C/M ratios in 6 healthy controls, 4 CF heterozygotes, 18 CF subjects and 4 subjects with 'CFTR-related' conditions. The assay discriminated all groups clearly. It also revealed consistent differences in the C/M ratio among subjects within groups. We hypothesize that these differences reflect, at least in part, levels of CFTR expression, which are known to vary widely. When C-sweat rates become very low the C/M ratio also tended to decrease; we hypothesize that this nonlinearity reflects ductal fluid absorption. We also discovered that M-sweating potentiates the subsequent C-sweat response. We then used potentiation as a surrogate for drugs that can increase CFTR-dependent secretion. This bioassay provides an additional method for assessing CFTR function in vivo, and is well suited for within-subject tests of systemic, CFTR-directed therapeutics.

Indexed as

Adrenergic beta-AgonistsAdultAminophyllineAtropineCystic FibrosisCystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance RegulatorDose-Response Relationship, DrugFemaleHeterozygoteHumansInjections, IntradermalIsoproterenolMaleMethacholine ChlorideMuscarinic AgonistsMuscarinic AntagonistsAdrenergic beta-AgonistsAminophyllineAtropineCystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance RegulatorIsoproterenolMethacholine ChlorideMuscarinic AgonistsMuscarinic AntagonistsPurinergic P1 Receptor Antagonists

Identifiers

PMID24204751
PMCPMC3811985
OpenAlexW2054787887

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.