Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24204732›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2013

Cholesteryl ester transfer protein inhibitors in the treatment of dyslipidemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Chuanwei Li, Wen Zhang, Faying Zhou, Caiyu Chen, Liang Zhou, Yafei Li, Ling Liu, Fang Pei, Hao Luo, Zhangxue Hu and 2 more

Full text readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. The correlation of lymphocyte subsets, natural killer cell, and Parkinson's disease: a meta-analysis.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2017
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Biochemical Activity and Hypoglycemic Effects ofBioMed research international · 2018
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Chuanwei LiDepartment of Cardiology, Daping Hospital, The Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, PR China ; Chongqing Institute of Cardiology, Chongqing, PR China.
Wen Zhang
Faying Zhou
Caiyu Chen
Liang Zhou
Yafei Li
Ling Liu
Fang Pei
Hao Luo
Zhangxue Hu
Jing Cai
Chunyu Zeng

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) inhibitors are gaining substantial research interest for raising high density lipoprotein cholesterol levels. The aim of the research was to estimate the efficacy and safety of cholesteryl ester transfer protein inhibitors as novel lipid modifying drugs. Systematic searches of English literature for randomized controlled trials (RCT) were collected from MEDLINE, EBASE, CENTRAL and references listed in eligible studies. Two independent authors assessed the search results and only included the double-blind RCTs by using cholesteryl ester transfer protein inhibitors as exclusively or co-administrated with statin therapy irrespective of gender in enrolled adult subjects. Two independent authors extracted the data by using predefined data fields. Of 503 studies identified, 14 studies met the inclusion criteria, and 12 studies were included into the final meta-analysis. Our meta-analysis revealed that CETP inhibitors increased the HDL-c levels (n = 2826, p<0.00001, mean difference (MD) = 20.47, 95% CI [19.80 to 21.15]) and total cholesterol (n = 3423, p = 0.0002, MD = 3.57, 95%CI [1.69 to 5.44] to some extent combined with a reduction in triglyceride (n = 3739, p<0.00001, MD = -10.47, 95% CI [-11.91 to -9.03]) and LDL-c (n = 3159, p<0.00001, MD = -17.12, 95% CI [-18.87 to -15.36]) irrespective of mono-therapy or co-administration with statins. Subgroup analysis suggested that the lipid modifying effects varied according to the four currently available CETP inhibitors. CETP inhibitor therapy did not increase the adverse events when compared with control. However, we observed a slight increase in blood pressure (SBP, n = 2384, p<0.00001, MD = 2.73, 95% CI [2.14 to 3.31], DBP, n = 2384, p<0.00001, MD = 1.16, 95% CI [0.73 to 1.60]) after CETP inhibitor treatment, which were mainly ascribed to the torcetrapib treatment subgroup. CETP inhibitors therapy is associated with significant increase in HDL-c and decrease in triglyceride and LDL-c with satisfactory safety and tolerability in patients with dyslipidemia. However, the side-effect on blood pressure deserves more consideration in future studies.

Indexed as

AdultAmidesAnticholesteremic AgentsBenzodiazepinesBlood PressureCholesterolCholesterol Ester Transfer ProteinsCholesterol, HDLCholesterol, LDLDrug Therapy, CombinationDyslipidemiasEstersHumansHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsOxazolidinonesQuinolinesAmidesanacetrapibAnticholesteremic AgentsBenzodiazepinesCETP protein, humanCholesterolCholesterol Ester Transfer ProteinsCholesterol, HDLCholesterol, LDLdalcetrapibEstersevacetrapibHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsOxazolidinonesQuinolinesSulfhydryl CompoundstorcetrapibTriglycerides

Identifiers

PMID24204732
PMCPMC3810261

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.