Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24204600›Full record

ArticlePloS one2013

Mechanical control of organ size in the development of the Drosophila wing disc.

Thomas Schluck, Ulrike Nienhaus, Tinri Aegerter-Wilmsen, Christof M Aegerter

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. How Cell Geometry and Cellular Patterning Influence Tissue Stiffness.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  5. The wing imaginal disc.Genetics · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Hippo signalling during development.Development (Cambridge, England) · 2019
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Statistics of noisy growth with mechanical feedback in elastic tissues.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. The Journal of cell biology · 2018
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Thomas SchluckPhysik-Institut, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Ulrike Nienhaus
Tinri Aegerter-Wilmsen
Christof M Aegerter

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Control of cessation of growth in developing organs has recently been proposed to be influenced by mechanical forces acting on the tissue due to its growth. In particular, it was proposed that stretching of the tissue leads to an increase in cell proliferation. Using the model system of the Drosophila wing imaginal disc, we directly stretch the tissue finding a significant increase in cell proliferation, thus confirming this hypothesis. In addition, we characterize the growth over the entire growth period of the wing disc finding a correlation between the apical cell area and cell proliferation rate. PACS NUMBERS: 87.19.lx, 87.18.Nq, 87.80.Ek, 87.17.Ee, 87.85.Xd.

Indexed as

Mechanical PhenomenaAnimalsDrosophilaOrgan SizeWings, Animal

Identifiers

PMID24204600
PMCPMC3808387

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.