ArticlePloS one2013
Atomic-accuracy prediction of protein loop structures through an RNA-inspired Ansatz.
Article in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- The HIV-1 nuclear export complex reveals the role of RNA in CRM1 cargo recognition.Molecular cell · 2025Article
- Pairing a high-resolution statistical potential with a nucleobase-centric sampling algorithm for improving RNA model refinement.Nature communications · 2021Article
- RNA-Puzzles Round IV: 3D structure predictions of four ribozymes and two aptamers.RNA (New York, N.Y.) · 2020Article
- Macromolecular modeling and design in Rosetta: recent methods and frameworks.Nature methods · 2020Review
- A key interaction with RPA orients XPA in NER complexes.Nucleic acids research · 2020Article
- Computational design of structured loops for new protein functions.Biological chemistry · 2019Review
- Blind prediction of noncanonical RNA structure at atomic accuracy.Science advances · 2018Article
- RosettaAntibodyDesign (RAbD): A general framework for computational antibody design.PLoS computational biology · 2018Article
- RNA-Puzzles Round III: 3D RNA structure prediction of five riboswitches and one ribozyme.RNA (New York, N.Y.) · 2017Article
- Accurate Structure Prediction of CDR H3 Loops Enabled by a Novel Structure-Based C-Terminal Constraint.Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950) · 2017Article
- Protocols for Molecular Modeling with Rosetta3 and RosettaScripts.Biochemistry · 2016Review
- Blind prediction performance of RosettaAntibody 3.0: grafting, relaxation, kinematic loop modeling, and full CDR optimization.Proteins · 2014Article
- Antibody structure determination using a combination of homology modeling, energy-based refinement, and loop prediction.Proteins · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
Consistently predicting biopolymer structure at atomic resolution from sequence alone remains a difficult problem, even for small sub-segments of large proteins. Such loop prediction challenges, which arise frequently in comparative modeling and protein design, can become intractable as loop lengths exceed 10 residues and if surrounding side-chain conformations are erased. Current approaches, such as the protein local optimization protocol or kinematic inversion closure (KIC) Monte Carlo, involve stages that coarse-grain proteins, simplifying modeling but precluding a systematic search of all-atom configurations. This article introduces an alternative modeling strategy based on a 'stepwise ansatz', recently developed for RNA modeling, which posits that any realistic all-atom molecular conformation can be built up by residue-by-residue stepwise enumeration. When harnessed to a dynamic-programming-like recursion in the Rosetta framework, the resulting stepwise assembly (SWA) protocol enables enumerative sampling of a 12 residue loop at a significant but achievable cost of thousands of CPU-hours. In a previously established benchmark, SWA recovers crystallographic conformations with sub-Angstrom accuracy for 19 of 20 loops, compared to 14 of 20 by KIC modeling with a comparable expenditure of computational power. Furthermore, SWA gives high accuracy results on an additional set of 15 loops highlighted in the biological literature for their irregularity or unusual length. Successes include cis-Pro touch turns, loops that pass through tunnels of other side-chains, and loops of lengths up to 24 residues. Remaining problem cases are traced to inaccuracies in the Rosetta all-atom energy function. In five additional blind tests, SWA achieves sub-Angstrom accuracy models, including the first such success in a protein/RNA binding interface, the YbxF/kink-turn interaction in the fourth 'RNA-puzzle' competition. These results establish all-atom enumeration as an unusually systematic approach to ab initio protein structure modeling that can leverage high performance computing and physically realistic energy functions to more consistently achieve atomic accuracy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.