Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24204362›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in neurology2013

Prospects of levetiracetam as a neuroprotective drug against status epilepticus, traumatic brain injury, and stroke.

Ashok K Shetty

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in neurology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Levetiracetam Mechanisms of Action: From Molecules to Systems.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. The Progress of Epilepsy after Stroke.Current neuropharmacology · 2018
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Effects of Different Doses of Levetiracetam on Aquaporin 4 Expression in Rats with Brain Edema Following Fluid Percussion Injury.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2016
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ashok K ShettyInstitute for Regenerative Medicine, Texas A&M Health Science Center College of Medicine at Scott & White , Temple, TX , USA ; Research Service, Olin E. Teague Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Central Texas Veterans Health Care System , Temple, TX , USA ; Department of Molecular and Cellular Medicine, Texas A&M Health Science Center College of Medicine , College Station, TX , USA.
Scott & White Memorial Hospital · US

Funding

Neural Grafts and Injury-Induced Hippocampal DysfunctionR01NS054780 · NINDS · TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCE CTR · PI SHETTY, ASHOK K · 2006 to 2010
$1.4M
BLRD VA I01 BX000883BLRD VA IK6 BX003612NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS054780
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Levetiracetam (LEV) is an anti-epileptic drug commonly used for the treatment of partial onset and generalized seizures. In addition to its neuromodulatory and neuroinhibitory effects via its binding to the synaptic vesicle protein SV2A, multiple studies have suggested neuroprotective properties for LEV in both epileptic and non-epileptic conditions. The purpose of this review is to discuss the extent of LEV-mediated protection seen in different neurological conditions, the potential of LEV for easing epileptogenesis, and the possible mechanisms that underlie the protective properties of LEV. LEV has been found to be particularly beneficial for restraining seizures in animal models of spontaneous epilepsy, acute seizures, and status epilepticus (SE). However, its ability for easing epileptogenesis and cognitive dysfunction following SE remains controversial with some studies implying favorable outcomes and others reporting no beneficial effects. Efficacy of LEV as a neuroprotective drug against traumatic brain injury (TBI) has received much attention. While animal studies in TBI models have showed significant neuroprotection and improvements in motor and memory performance with LEV treatment, clinical studies suggest that LEV has similar efficacy as phenytoin in terms of its ability to prevent post-traumatic epilepsy. LEV treatment for TBI is also reported to have fewer adverse effects and monitoring considerations but electroencephalographic recordings suggest the presence of increased seizure tendency. Studies on stroke imply that LEV is a useful alternative to carbamazepine for preventing post-stroke seizures in terms of efficacy and safety. Thus, LEV treatment has promise for restraining SE-, TBI-, or stroke-induced chronic epilepsy. Nevertheless, additional studies are needed to ascertain the most apt dose, timing of intervention, and duration of treatment after the initial precipitating injury and the mechanisms underlying LEV-mediated beneficial effects.

Indexed as

acute seizureschronic epilepsyepileptogenesisneurodegenerationpost-traumatic epilepsypost-traumatic seizuresstroketraumatic brain injury

Identifiers

PMID24204362
PMCPMC3816384
OpenAlexW1993562701

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.