ArticlePLoS genetics2013
Mining the human phenome using allelic scores that index biological intermediates.
Article in PLoS genetics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
47 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Selecting instruments for Mendelian randomization in the wake of genome-wide association studies.International journal of epidemiology · 2016Pooled it
- Cardiovascular Risk Factors and Ischemic Heart Disease: Is the Confluence of Risk Factors Greater Than the Parts? A Genetic Approach.Circulation. Cardiovascular genetics · 2016Pooled it
- Investigating the Relationship Between Maternal Smoking During Pregnancy and Offspring Handedness: Extending the Proxy Gene-by-Environment Mendelian Randomization Study Design to Include Polygenic Risk Scores.Behavior genetics · 2025Article
- Prioritizing genomic variants through neuro-symbolic, knowledge-enhanced learning.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2024Article
- New Insights into Polygenic Score-Lifestyle Interactions for Cardiometabolic Risk Factors from Genome-Wide Interaction Analyses.Nutrients · 2023Article
- A Polygenic Risk Score Enhances Risk Prediction for Adolescents' Antisocial Behavior over the Combined Effect of 22 Extra-familial, Familial, and Individual Risk Factors in the Context of the Family Check-Up.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2023Article
- Applying Mendelian randomization to appraise causality in relationships between nutrition and cancer.Cancer causes & control : CCC · 2022Article
- Genetics and erectile dysfunction: leveraging early foundations for new discoveries.International journal of impotence research · 2022Review
- A two-sample robust Bayesian Mendelian Randomization method accounting for linkage disequilibrium and idiosyncratic pleiotropy with applications to the COVID-19 outcomes.Genetic epidemiology · 2022Article
- Exploring the causal effect of maternal pregnancy adiposity on offspring adiposity: Mendelian randomisation using polygenic risk scores.BMC medicine · 2022Article
- Target Discovery for Drug Development Using Mendelian Randomization.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022Review
- Body mass index and subfertility: multivariable regression and Mendelian randomization analyses in the Norwegian Mother, Father and Child Cohort Study.Human reproduction (Oxford, England) · 2021Article
- Computational Tools for Causal Inference in Genetics.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine · 2021Review
- Polygenic Mendelian Randomization.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine · 2021Review
- Phenome-wide Mendelian randomization mapping the influence of the plasma proteome on complex diseases.Nature genetics · 2020Article
- Observational
- Evidence for two genetically distinct pathways to co-occurring internalizing and externalizing problems in adolescence characterized by negative affectivity or behavioral inhibition.Journal of abnormal psychology · 2020Article
- "Mendelian Randomization" Approach in Economic Assessment of Health Conditions.Frontiers in public health · 2019Review
- Use of Mendelian Randomization to Examine Causal Inference in Osteoporosis.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2019Review
- Using genetic data to strengthen causal inference in observational research.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
Abstract
It is common practice in genome-wide association studies (GWAS) to focus on the relationship between disease risk and genetic variants one marker at a time. When relevant genes are identified it is often possible to implicate biological intermediates and pathways likely to be involved in disease aetiology. However, single genetic variants typically explain small amounts of disease risk. Our idea is to construct allelic scores that explain greater proportions of the variance in biological intermediates, and subsequently use these scores to data mine GWAS. To investigate the approach's properties, we indexed three biological intermediates where the results of large GWAS meta-analyses were available: body mass index, C-reactive protein and low density lipoprotein levels. We generated allelic scores in the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children, and in publicly available data from the first Wellcome Trust Case Control Consortium. We compared the explanatory ability of allelic scores in terms of their capacity to proxy for the intermediate of interest, and the extent to which they associated with disease. We found that allelic scores derived from known variants and allelic scores derived from hundreds of thousands of genetic markers explained significant portions of the variance in biological intermediates of interest, and many of these scores showed expected correlations with disease. Genome-wide allelic scores however tended to lack specificity suggesting that they should be used with caution and perhaps only to proxy biological intermediates for which there are no known individual variants. Power calculations confirm the feasibility of extending our strategy to the analysis of tens of thousands of molecular phenotypes in large genome-wide meta-analyses. We conclude that our method represents a simple way in which potentially tens of thousands of molecular phenotypes could be screened for causal relationships with disease without having to expensively measure these variables in individual disease collections.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.