Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24203336›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2014

Applications of NMR-based PRE and EPR-based DEER spectroscopy to homodimer chain exchange characterization and structure determination.

Yunhuang Yang, Theresa A Ramelot, Shuisong Ni, Robert M McCarrick, Michael A Kennedy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yunhuang YangDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry and the Northeast Structural Genomics Consortium, Miami University, Oxford, OH, USA.
Theresa A Ramelot
Shuisong Ni
Robert M McCarrick
Michael A Kennedy

Funding

Sub-project 9U54GM074958 · NIGMS · RUTGERS THE ST UNIV OF NJ NEW BRUNSWICK · PI KENNEDY, MICHAEL ALLEN · 2005 to 2009
$56.6M
University of Georgia ProjectU54GM094597 · NIGMS · RUTGERS, THE STATE UNIV OF N.J. · PI ROST, BURKHARD · 2010 to 2014
$36.9M
NIGMS NIH HHS U54 GM074958NIGMS NIH HHS U54-GM074958NIGMS NIH HHS U54 GM094597
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The success of homodimer structure determination by conventional solution NMR spectroscopy relies greatly on interchain distance restraints (less than 6 Å) derived from nuclear Overhauser effects (NOEs) obtained from (13)C-edited, (12)C-filtered NOESY experiments. However, these experiments may fail when the mixed (13)C-/(12)C-homodimer is never significantly populated due to slow homodimer chain exchange. Thus, knowledge of the homodimer chain exchange kinetics can be put to practical use in preparing samples using the traditional NMR method. Here, we described detailed procedures for using paramagnetic resonance enhancements (PREs) and EPR spectroscopy to measure homodimer chain exchange kinetics. In addition, PRE and EPR methods can be combined to provide mid-range (<30 Å) and long-range (17-80 Å) interchain distance restraints for homodimer structure determination as a supplement to short-range intrachain and interchain distance restraints (less than 6 Å) typically obtained from (1)H-(1)H NOESY experiments. We present a summary of how to measure these distances using NMR-based PREs and EPR-based double electron electron resonance (DEER) measurements and how to include them in homodimer structure calculations.

Indexed as

Electron Spin Resonance SpectroscopyModels, MolecularNuclear Magnetic Resonance, BiomolecularProtein ConformationProtein MultimerizationProteinsProteins

Identifiers

PMID24203336
PMCPMC4075034

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.