Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24202710›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2014

Long-term oncologic outcome after laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer.

Ayman Agha, Volker Benseler, Matthias Hornung, Michael Gerken, Igors Iesalnieks, Alois Fürst, Matthias Anthuber, Karl-Walter Jauch, Hans J Schlitt

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Long-Term Oncologic Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Proctectomy for Rectal Adenocarcinoma.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2018
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Critical appraisal of laparoscopic vs open rectal cancer surgery.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2016
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. [Scientific evidence for laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2014
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ayman AghaDepartment of Surgery, University Medical Centre Regensburg, University of Regensburg, Franz-Josef-Strauss-Allee 11, 93053, Regensburg, Germany.
Volker Benseler
Matthias Hornung
Michael Gerken
Igors Iesalnieks
Alois Fürst
Matthias Anthuber
Karl-Walter Jauch
Hans J Schlitt
University of Regensburg · DELudwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DEUniversity Hospital Regensburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecent studies demonstrated favorable short- and mid-term results after laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer. However, long-term results from large series are lacking. The present study analyses long-term results of laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery from a large-volume center.

methodsFrom January 1998 until March 2005, 225 patients underwent laparoscopic rectal resection due to carcinoma at the Medical Centre of the University of Regensburg. From 224 patients, a follow-up over 10 years was performed using the data of the Tumour Centre of the University of Regensburg. The data were analysed using oncological data (tumour recurrence) as well as overall survival. In addition, the effect of conversion to open resection on overall survival was analysed.

resultsWith a median of 10 years at follow-up, the overall and disease-free survival was 50.5 and 50.1 %, respectively. Local recurrence of all patients was 5.8 % and none of the converted patients was within this group. The median time interval for the development of local recurrence was 30 months. Six of the 13 patients with local recurrence (46.1 %) had received neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy before surgery. Patients with a conversion to open surgery had primarily a significantly worse outcome than patients resected completely laparoscopically (p = 0.003). However, this difference was no longer apparent using a multivariant analysis (hazard ratio 1.221; p = 0.478).

conclusionsOverall survival and local recurrence rate of patients undergoing laparoscopic resection of rectal cancer are comparable to open surgery. However, in our analysis, patients undergoing laparoscopic anterior resection had a higher survival rate compared with patients with abdominoperineal resection.

Indexed as

ForecastingAdultAgedAged, 80 and overColectomyConversion to Open SurgeryDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleGermanyHumansIncidenceLaparoscopyMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalProportional Hazards Models

Identifiers

PMID24202710
OpenAlexW1997984432

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.