ArticleLab on a chip2014
Isolation of breast cancer and gastric cancer circulating tumor cells by use of an anti HER2-based microfluidic device.
Article in Lab on a chip, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
42 citing papers in PubMed, 107 citations in OpenAlex.
- Trial
- Review
- Breast cancer extracellular matrix invasion depends on local mechanical loading of the collagen network.Journal of materials chemistry. B · 2025Article
- Detecting HER2-positive circulating tumor cells in gastric cancer using a flow cytometry-based approach.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- The integrated on-chip isolation and detection of circulating tumour cells.Sensors & diagnostics · 2024Review
- Integrated "lab-on-a-chip" microfluidic systems for isolation, enrichment, and analysis of cancer biomarkers.Lab on a chip · 2023Review
- Liquid biopsy biomarkers to guide immunotherapy in breast cancer.Frontiers in immunology · 2023Review
- Technologies for Viable Circulating Tumor Cell Isolation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Clinical Relevancy of Circulating Tumor Cells in Breast Cancer: Epithelial or Mesenchymal Characteristics, Single Cells or Clusters?International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Molecular and Circulating Biomarkers of Gastric Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Breast cancer circulating tumor cells with mesenchymal features-an unreachable target?Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2022Review
- Evolution in Automatized Detection of Cells: Advances in Magnetic Microcytometers for Cancer Cells.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2022Review
- Article
- Review
- Magnetic Particles for CTC Enrichment.Cancers · 2020Review
- EMT-Associated Heterogeneity in Circulating Tumor Cells: Sticky Friends on the Road to Metastasis.Cancers · 2020Review
- Enrichment of Circulating Tumor Cells from Whole Blood Using a Microfluidic Device for Sequential Physical and Magnetophoretic Separations.Micromachines · 2020Article
- Review
- Using the polymeric circulating tumor cell chip to capture circulating tumor cells in blood samples of patients with colorectal cancer.Oncology letters · 2020Article
- Potential theranostics of circulating tumor cells and tumor-derived exosomes application in colorectal cancer.Cancer cell international · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) have emerged as a reliable source of tumor cells, and their concentration has prognostic implications. CTC capture offers real-time access to cancer tissue without the need of an invasive biopsy, while their phenotypic and molecular interrogation can provide insight into the biological changes of the tumor that occur during treatment. The majority of the CTC capture methods are based on EpCAM expression as a surface marker of tumor-derived cells. However, EpCAM protein expression levels can be significantly down regulated during cancer progression as a consequence of the process of epithelial to mesenchymal transition. In this paper, we describe a novel HER2 (Human Epidermal Receptor 2)-based microfluidic device for the isolation of CTCs from peripheral blood of patients with HER2-expressing solid tumors. We selected HER2 as an alternative to EpCAM as the receptor is biologically and therapeutically relevant in several solid tumors, like breast cancer (BC), where it is overexpressed in 30% of the patients and expressed in 90%, and gastric cancer (GC), in which HER2 presence is identified in more than 60% of the cases. We tested the performance of various anti HER2 antibodies in a panel of nine different BC cell lines with varying HER2 protein expression levels, using immunoblotting, confocal microscopy, live cells imaging and flow cytometry analyses. The antibody associated with the highest capture efficiency and sensitivity for HER2 expressing cells on the microfluidic device was the one that performed best in live cells imaging and flow cytometry assays as opposed to the fixed cell analyses, suggesting that recognition of the native conformation of the HER2 extracellular epitope on living cells was essential for specificity and sensitivity of CTC capture. Next, we tested the performance of the HER2 microfluidic device using blood from metastatic breast and gastric cancer patients. The HER2 microfluidic device exhibited CTC capture in 9/9 blood samples. Thus, the described HER2-based microfluidic device can be considered as a valid clinically relevant method for CTC capture in HER2 expressing solid cancers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.