Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24202699›Full record

ArticleLab on a chip2014

Isolation of breast cancer and gastric cancer circulating tumor cells by use of an anti HER2-based microfluidic device.

Giuseppe Galletti, Matthew S Sung, Linda T Vahdat, Manish A Shah, Steven M Santana, Giuseppe Altavilla, Brian J Kirby, Paraskevi Giannakakou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Lab on a chip, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 107 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Technologies for Viable Circulating Tumor Cell Isolation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Molecular and Circulating Biomarkers of Gastric Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Giuseppe GallettiWeill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY, USA. pag2015@med.cornell.edu.
Matthew S Sung
Linda T Vahdat
Manish A Shah
Steven M Santana
Giuseppe Altavilla
Brian J Kirby
Paraskevi Giannakakou
Cornell University · USUniversity of Messina · IT

Funding

TRANS-NETWORK PROJECTSU54CA143876 · NCI · CORNELL UNIVERSITY · PI SHULER, MICHAEL L · 2009 to 2014
$12.6M
CANCER PHARMACOLOGYT32CA062948 · NCI · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI LORRAINE J GUDAS · 1994 to 2026
$12.1M
Microtubule dependent AR signaling predicts taxane sensitivityR01CA137020 · NCI · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI GIANNAKAKOU, PARASKEVI · 2009 to 2013
$1.7M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA137020NCI NIH HHS T32 CA062948NCI NIH HHS U54 CA143876
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) have emerged as a reliable source of tumor cells, and their concentration has prognostic implications. CTC capture offers real-time access to cancer tissue without the need of an invasive biopsy, while their phenotypic and molecular interrogation can provide insight into the biological changes of the tumor that occur during treatment. The majority of the CTC capture methods are based on EpCAM expression as a surface marker of tumor-derived cells. However, EpCAM protein expression levels can be significantly down regulated during cancer progression as a consequence of the process of epithelial to mesenchymal transition. In this paper, we describe a novel HER2 (Human Epidermal Receptor 2)-based microfluidic device for the isolation of CTCs from peripheral blood of patients with HER2-expressing solid tumors. We selected HER2 as an alternative to EpCAM as the receptor is biologically and therapeutically relevant in several solid tumors, like breast cancer (BC), where it is overexpressed in 30% of the patients and expressed in 90%, and gastric cancer (GC), in which HER2 presence is identified in more than 60% of the cases. We tested the performance of various anti HER2 antibodies in a panel of nine different BC cell lines with varying HER2 protein expression levels, using immunoblotting, confocal microscopy, live cells imaging and flow cytometry analyses. The antibody associated with the highest capture efficiency and sensitivity for HER2 expressing cells on the microfluidic device was the one that performed best in live cells imaging and flow cytometry assays as opposed to the fixed cell analyses, suggesting that recognition of the native conformation of the HER2 extracellular epitope on living cells was essential for specificity and sensitivity of CTC capture. Next, we tested the performance of the HER2 microfluidic device using blood from metastatic breast and gastric cancer patients. The HER2 microfluidic device exhibited CTC capture in 9/9 blood samples. Thus, the described HER2-based microfluidic device can be considered as a valid clinically relevant method for CTC capture in HER2 expressing solid cancers.

Indexed as

Antibodies, ImmobilizedAntineoplastic AgentsBreast NeoplasmsCell Line, TumorCell SeparationErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesFemaleHumansMicrofluidic Analytical TechniquesNeoplastic Cells, CirculatingStomach NeoplasmsAntibodies, ImmobilizedAntineoplastic AgentsERBB2 protein, humanErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine Kinases

Identifiers

PMID24202699
PMCPMC3921117
OpenAlexW2160650871

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.