Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24202391›Full record

ReviewNature medicine2013

Mechanisms of resistance to therapies targeting BRCA-mutant cancers.

Christopher J Lord, Alan Ashworth

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature medicine, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 250 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
250citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
18.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

250 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 454 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

190 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Christopher J LordThe Breakthrough Breast Cancer Research Centre and Cancer Research UK Gene Function Laboratory, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
Alan Ashworth
Cancer Research UK · GB

Funding

Breast Cancer Now BREAST CANCER NOW RESEARCH CENTRECancer Research UK 14276Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Synthetic lethality provides a potential mechanistic framework for the therapeutic targeting of genetic and functional deficiencies in cancers and is now being explored widely. The first clinical exemplification of synthetic lethality in cancer has been the exploitation of inhibitors of poly-(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) for the treatment of cancers with defects in the BRCA1 or BRCA2 tumor suppressor proteins, which are involved in the repair of DNA damage. Although this approach has shown promise, multiple potential resistance mechanisms have been identified. In this Perspective, we discuss these mechanisms and their relevance to the development of selective therapies for BRCA-deficient cancers.

Indexed as

Genes, BRCA1Genes, BRCA2AnimalsChromosomal Proteins, Non-HistoneDNA-Binding ProteinsDrug Resistance, NeoplasmEnzyme InhibitorsFemaleHumansMiceMutationNeoplasmsPlatinum CompoundsPoly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase InhibitorsPoly(ADP-ribose) PolymerasesSynthetic BiologyChromosomal Proteins, Non-HistoneDNA-Binding ProteinsEnzyme InhibitorsPlatinum CompoundsPoly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase InhibitorsPoly(ADP-ribose) PolymerasesTrp53bp1 protein, mouseTumor Suppressor p53-Binding Protein 1

Identifiers

PMID24202391
OpenAlexW1993043513

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.