ArticleAnalytical and bioanalytical chemistry2014
Differentiation of Escherichia coli serotypes using DC gradient insulator dielectrophoresis.
Article in Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed.
- Quantifying and Minimizing the Variance of Gradient Insulator-Based Dielectrophoresis.Micromachines · 2026Article
- A fast and label-free DC-iDEP microfluidic device detects bacterial motility and andrographolide efficacy in motility inhibition.Mikrochimica acta · 2025Article
- On Using Electric Circuit Models to Analyze Electric Field Distributions in Insulator-Based Electrokinetically Driven Microfluidic Devices.Micromachines · 2025Article
- A Novel Hybrid Platform for Live/Dead Bacteria Accurate Sorting by On-Chip DEP Device.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- The latest advances on nonlinear insulator-based electrokinetic microsystems under direct current and low-frequency alternating current fields: a review.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2022Review
- The latest advances on nonlinear insulator-based electrokinetic microsystems under direct current and low-frequency alternating current fields: a review.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2022Review
- Analytics in Microfluidic Systems.Advances in biochemical engineering/biotechnology · 2022Article
- Particle trapping in electrically driven insulator-based microfluidics: Dielectrophoresis and induced-charge electrokinetics.Electrophoresis · 2021Review
- Methods of Generating Dielectrophoretic Force for Microfluidic Manipulation of Bioparticles.ACS biomaterials science & engineering · 2021Review
- Dielectrophoresis: Developments and applications from 2010 to 2020.Electrophoresis · 2021Review
- Determination of the Empirical Electrokinetic Equilibrium Condition of Microorganisms in Microfluidic Devices.Biosensors · 2020Article
- Dielectrophoretic analysis of the impact of isopropyl alcohol on the electric polarisability of Escherichia coli whole-cells.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2020Article
- Differential Biophysical Behaviors of Closely Related Strains of Salmonella.Frontiers in microbiology · 2020Article
- Effects of surface treatments on trapping with DC insulator-based dielectrophoresis.The Analyst · 2019Article
- Thermal Shock Response of Yeast Cells Characterised by Dielectrophoresis Force Measurement.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Article
- Characterization of Simple and Double Yeast Cells Using Dielectrophoretic Force Measurement.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Article
- Isolation and identification of Listeria monocytogenes utilizing DC insulator-based dielectrophoresis.Analytica chimica acta · 2019Article
- A mathematical model of dielectrophoretic data to connect measurements with cell properties.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2019Article
- Refinement of insulator-based dielectrophoresis.The Analyst · 2017Article
- Dielectrophoresis for Biomedical Sciences Applications: A Review.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Bacteria play a significant role in both human health and disease. An estimated 9.4 million cases of foodborne illness occur in the United States each year. As a result, rapid identification and characterization of microorganisms remains an important research objective. Despite limitations, selective culturing retains a central role among a cadre of identification strategies. For the past decade, separations-based approaches to rapid bacterial identification have been under investigation. Gradient insulator dielectrophoresis (g-iDEP) promises benefits in the form of rapid and specific separation of very similar bacteria, including serotypes of a single species. Furthermore, this approach allows simultaneous concentration of analyte, facilitating detection and downstream analysis. Differentiation of three serotypes or strains of Escherichia coli bacteria is demonstrated within a single g-iDEP microchannel, based on their characteristic electrokinetic properties. Whole cells were captured and concentrated using a range of applied potentials, which generated average electric fields between 160 and 470 V/cm. Bacteria remained viable after exposure to these fields, as determined by cellular motility. These results indicate the potential g-iDEP holds in terms of both separatory power and the possibility for diagnostic applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.