ReviewDer Orthopade2013
[Biotechnological therapies for the treatment of back pain: alternatives to corticosteroids].
Review in Der Orthopade, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Retraction · 2014-07-16Error by Journal/Publisher ·
- Retracted
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In recent years, it is increasingly clear that back pain is not only caused by biomechanical problems. Currently, biologically-based local therapy concepts for the treatment of affected spinal regions as an alternative to the standard treatment with steroids are in development or in early stages of clinical application. The common features of these new therapies are to intervene in the regulation of homeostasis at various key points at the affected region and specifically to suppress or block catabolic influences as well as to provide with anti-inflammatory substances and growth factors. These include on one hand the genetically produced Biologicals such as TNF-α inhibitors and cytokine antagonists and on the other hand therapies with autologous blood preparations (Autologous Conditioned Serum [ACS], and Platelet Rich Plasma formulations [PRP]). This article presents the individual methods, gives an overview of developments and results of various studies and discusses current recommendations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.