Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24201300›Full record

SynthesisCirculation2014

Long-term coffee consumption and risk of cardiovascular disease: a systematic review and a dose-response meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies.

Ming Ding, Shilpa N Bhupathiraju, Ambika Satija, Rob M van Dam, Frank B Hu

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Circulation, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04827251 (Evaluation of the Effect of Espresso on Platelet Aggregability in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease), which is not on this map. Cited by 265 papers, 13 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
265citing papers in PubMed, 13 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04827251 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Evaluation of the Effect of Espresso on Platelet Aggregability in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Sao PauloRan2022 to 2024Enrolled29ConditionsCoronary Artery DiseaseArmsCoffee
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

265 citing papers in PubMed, 13 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. The Effects of Caffeine on Anxiety Behavior in Healthy Individuals: A Systematic Review of the Literature.Stress and health : journal of the International Society for the Investigation of Stress · 2026
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Risk factors for the development of premature ventricular complex-induced cardiomyopathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing · 2023
    Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Pooled it
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Therapeutic potential of phytochemical compounds in cardiovascular disease: a comprehensive review.Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society · 2026
    Review

205 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ming DingDepartments of Nutrition (M.D., S.N.B., A.S., R.M.v.D., F.B.H.) and Epidemiology (F.B.H.), Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA; Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health and Department of Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore and National University Health System, Singapore (R.M.v.D.); and Channing Division of Network Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (F.B.H.).
Shilpa N Bhupathiraju
Ambika Satija
Rob M van Dam
Frank B Hu

Funding

DIETARY PATTERNS AND RISK OF CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASER01HL060712 · NHLBI · HARVARD UNIVERSITY (SCH OF PUBLIC HLTH) · PI HU, FRANK B, QI, QIBIN · 1998 to 2021
$8.0M
NHLBI NIH HHS HL60712NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL060712
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundConsiderable controversy exists on the association between coffee consumption and cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk. A meta-analysis was performed to assess the dose-response relationship of long-term coffee consumption with CVD risk. METHODS AND

resultsPubMed and EMBASE were searched for prospective cohort studies of the relationship between coffee consumption and CVD risk, which included coronary heart disease, stroke, heart failure, and CVD mortality. Thirty-six studies were included with 1 279 804 participants and 36 352 CVD cases. A nonlinear relationship of coffee consumption with CVD risk was identified (P for heterogeneity=0.09, P for trend <0.001, P for nonlinearity <0.001). Compared with the lowest category of coffee consumption (median, 0 cups per day), the relative risk of CVD was 0.95 (95% confidence interval, 0.87-1.03) for the highest category (median, 5 cups per day) category, 0.85 (95% confidence interval, 0.80-0.90) for the second highest category (median, 3.5 cups per day), and 0.89 (95% confidence interval, 0.84-0.94) for the third highest category (median, 1.5 cups per day). Looking at separate outcomes, coffee consumption was nonlinearly associated with both coronary heart disease (P for heterogeneity=0.001, P for trend <0.001, P for nonlinearity <0.001) and stroke (P for heterogeneity=0.07, P for trend <0.001, P for nonlinearity <0.001; P for trend differences >0.05) risks.

conclusionsA nonlinear association between coffee consumption and CVD risk was observed in this meta-analysis. Moderate coffee consumption was inversely significantly associated with CVD risk, with the lowest CVD risk at 3 to 5 cups per day, and heavy coffee consumption was not associated with elevated CVD risk.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular DiseasesCoffeeCoronary DiseaseHeart FailureHumansNonlinear DynamicsProspective StudiesRisk FactorsStrokeCoffeecardiovascular diseasescoffeemeta-analysis

Identifiers

PMID24201300
PMCPMC3945962

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.