Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24201224›Full record

ReviewDrug discovery today2014

Engineered renal tissue as a potential platform for pharmacokinetic and nephrotoxicity testing.

Jamie Davies

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Drug discovery today, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. CaAntibodies (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jamie DaviesUniversity of Edinburgh, United Kingdom. Electronic address: jamie.davies@ed.ac.uk.
University of Edinburgh · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/K010735/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pharmacology and regenerative medicine interact in two ways. One is the use of drugs to promote tissue regeneration. The other, less obvious but with great potential, is the use of techniques developed for regenerative medicine to engineer realistic human organoids for drug screening. This review focuses on testing for nephrotoxicity, often a problem with drugs and poorly predicted in animals. Current human-based screens mainly use proximal tubule cells growing in 2D monolayers. Realism might be improved by collagen-based culture systems that encourage proximal tubule cells to grow as tubules. More realistic would be a recently developed technique for engineering functioning 'mini-kidneys' from suspensions of stem cells, a technique that works in mouse but that could also be applied to humans.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell Culture TechniquesCells, CulturedDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsHumansKidneyTissue Engineering

Identifiers

PMID24201224
PMCPMC7615218
OpenAlexW1988035964

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.