Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24201048›Full record

ArticlePharmacology, biochemistry, and behavior2013

Sex differences in nicotine self-administration in rats during progressive unit dose reduction: implications for nicotine regulation policy.

Patricia Grebenstein, Danielle Burroughs, Yan Zhang, Mark G LeSage

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmacology, biochemistry, and behavior, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 55 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Nicotine Reduction in Cigarettes: Literature Review and Gap Analysis.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2019
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Intravenous Nicotine Self-Administration in Smokers: Dose-Response Function and Sex Differences.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2016
    Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Factors influencing JUUL e-cigarette nicotine vapour-induced reward, withdrawal, pharmacokinetics and brain connectivity in rats: sex matters.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Patricia GrebensteinDepartment of Medicine, Minneapolis Medical Research Foundation, United States.
Danielle Burroughs
Yan Zhang
Mark G LeSage

Funding

Determinants of Nicotine Reinforcement Thresholds and Demand Elasticity in RatsR01DA026444 · NIDA · HENNEPIN HEALTHCARE RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI LESAGE, MARK G · 2009 to 2013
$1.6M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA026444NIDA NIH HHS R01DA026444
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reducing the nicotine content in tobacco products is being considered by the FDA as a policy to reduce the addictiveness of tobacco products. Understanding individual differences in response to nicotine reduction will be critical to developing safe and effective policy. Animal and human research demonstrating sex differences in the reinforcing effects of nicotine suggests that males and females may respond differently to nicotine-reduction policies. However, no studies have directly examined sex differences in the effects of nicotine unit-dose reduction on nicotine self-administration (NSA) in animals. The purpose of the present study was to examine this issue in a rodent self-administration model. Male and female rats were trained to self-administer nicotine (0.06mg/kg) under an FR 3 schedule during daily 23h sessions. Rats were then exposed to saline extinction and reacquisition of NSA, followed by weekly reductions in the unit dose (0.03 to 0.00025mg/kg) until extinction levels of responding were achieved. Males and females were compared with respect to baseline levels of intake, resistance to extinction, degree of compensatory increases in responding during dose reduction, and the threshold reinforcing unit dose of nicotine. Exponential demand-curve analysis was also conducted to compare the sensitivity of males and females to increases in the unit price (FR/unit dose) of nicotine (i.e., elasticity of demand or reinforcing efficacy). Females exhibited significantly higher baseline intake and less compensation than males. However, there were no sex differences in the reinforcement threshold or elasticity of demand. Dose-response relationships were very well described by the exponential demand function (r(2) values>0.96 for individual subjects). These findings suggest that females may exhibit less compensatory smoking in response to nicotine reduction policies, even though their nicotine reinforcement threshold and elasticity of demand may not differ from males.

Indexed as

Sex FactorsAnimalsFemaleMaleNicotineRatsRats, Sprague-DawleySelf AdministrationNicotineBehavioral economicsFamily Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control ActNicotine self-administrationRatSex differences

Identifiers

PMID24201048
PMCPMC3903094

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.