Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24201028›Full record

ReviewJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA

Privacy preserving interactive record linkage (PPIRL).

Hye-Chung Kum, Ashok Krishnamurthy, Ashwin Machanavajjhala, Michael K Reiter, Stanley Ahalt

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Big Data Privacy in Biomedical Research.IEEE transactions on big data · 2020
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Big data in medicine is driving big changes.Yearbook of medical informatics · 2014
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Hye-Chung KumPopulation Informatics Research Group, Department of Computer Science, UNC-CH & Department of Health Policy and Management, Texas A&M Health Science Center, USA.
Ashok Krishnamurthy
Ashwin Machanavajjhala
Michael K Reiter
Stanley Ahalt

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveRecord linkage to integrate uncoordinated databases is critical in biomedical research using Big Data. Balancing privacy protection against the need for high quality record linkage requires a human-machine hybrid system to safely manage uncertainty in the ever changing streams of chaotic Big Data.

methodsIn the computer science literature, private record linkage is the most published area. It investigates how to apply a known linkage function safely when linking two tables. However, in practice, the linkage function is rarely known. Thus, there are many data linkage centers whose main role is to be the trusted third party to determine the linkage function manually and link data for research via a master population list for a designated region. Recently, a more flexible computerized third-party linkage platform, Secure Decoupled Linkage (SDLink), has been proposed based on: (1) decoupling data via encryption, (2) obfuscation via chaffing (adding fake data) and universe manipulation; and (3) minimum information disclosure via recoding.

resultsWe synthesize this literature to formalize a new framework for privacy preserving interactive record linkage (PPIRL) with tractable privacy and utility properties and then analyze the literature using this framework.

conclusionsHuman-based third-party linkage centers for privacy preserving record linkage are the accepted norm internationally. We find that a computer-based third-party platform that can precisely control the information disclosed at the micro level and allow frequent human interaction during the linkage process, is an effective human-machine hybrid system that significantly improves on the linkage center model both in terms of privacy and utility.

Indexed as

ConfidentialityMedical Records Systems, ComputerizedBiomedical ResearchComputer SecurityHumansMedical Record LinkageUser-Computer Interfacedecoupled dataElectronic Health Records (EHR)entity resolutionmedical record linkageprivacyprivacy preserving interactive record linkage (PPIRL)

Identifiers

PMID24201028
PMCPMC3932473

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.