ArticleThe Journal of veterinary medical science2014
Effect of methotrexate on neuroepithelium in the rat fetal brain.
Article in The Journal of veterinary medical science, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Time-course changes in 5-fluorouracil-induced neural progenitor cell damages in the developing rat brain.Journal of toxicologic pathology · 2021Article
- Effect of methotrexate exposure at late gestation on development of telencephalon in rat fetal brain.The Journal of veterinary medical science · 2016Article
- The role of folate metabolism in orofacial development and clefting.Developmental biology · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pregnant rats were treated with 30 mg/kg of methotrexate (MTX) on gestation day 13, and fetal brains were examined histopathologically from 6 to 48 hr after the treatment. In the telencephalon of the control group, there were few pyknotic neuroepithelial cells throughout the experimental period. Six hr after MTX treatment, several pyknotic neuroepithelial cells scattered throughout the telencephalic wall. At 12-36 hr, pyknotic neuroepithelial cells increased significantly and were diffusely distributed throughout the telencephalic wall. Neuroepithelial cells were eliminated and showed sparse cell density at 36 hr in the telencephalon. Almost all fetuses died at 48 hr. Most of the pyknotic neuroepithelial cells were positively stained by the TUNEL method and positive for cleaved caspase-3. While mitotic and phospho-histone H3-positive neuroepithelial cells were located along the ventricular layer of telencephalon in the control group, they were rarely observed in the same region at 6-36 hr in the MTX-treated group. MTX induced few pyknotic changes to neuroepithelial cells in the metencephalon, compared to other parts of brain. The distribution of apoptotic neuroepithelial cells and the time-course changes of the indices of apoptotic and mitotic neuroepithelial cells were different from those of other DNA-damaging chemicals reported previously. The difference may reflect the disparity in mechanisms of apoptosis and the inhibition of cell proliferation in neuroepithelial cells induced by MTX. To our knowledge, this is the first report demonstrating histopathological findings of fetal brain damage induced by MTX.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.