Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24200194›Full record

Trial reportBMC psychiatry2013

A multi-centre cohort study of short term outcomes of hospital treatment for anorexia nervosa in the UK.

Elizabeth Goddard, Rebecca Hibbs, Simone Raenker, Laura Salerno, Jon Arcelus, Nicky Boughton, Frances Connan, Ken Goss, Bert Laszlo, John Morgan and 8 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC psychiatry, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
11.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 113 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 13 institutions in 2 countries.

Elizabeth Goddard
Rebecca Hibbs
Simone Raenker
Laura Salerno
Jon Arcelus
Nicky Boughton
Frances Connan
Ken Goss
Bert Laszlo
John Morgan
Kim Moore
David Robertson
Saeidi S
Christa Schreiber-Kounine
Sonu Sharma
Linette Whitehead
Ulrike Schmidt
Janet Treasure
King's College London · GBKing's College School · GBOxford Health NHS Foundation Trust · GBSt George's, University of London · GBAvon and Wiltshire Mental Health Partnership NHS Trust · GBBirmingham and Solihull Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust · GBCentral and North West London NHS Foundation Trust · GBCoventry and Warwickshire Partnership NHS Trust · GBDevon Partnership NHS Trust · GBLeicestershire Partnership NHS Trust · GBShropshire Council · GBThe Priory Hospital · GBUniversity of Palermo · IT

Funding

Department of Health RP-PG-0606-1043
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIndividual, family and service level characteristics and outcomes are described for adult and adolescent patients receiving specialist inpatient or day patient treatment for anorexia nervosa (AN). Potential predictors of treatment outcome are explored.

methodAdmission and discharge data were collected from patients admitted at 14 UK hospital treatment units for AN over a period of three years (adult units N = 12; adolescent N = 2) (patients N = 177).

resultsOne hundred and seventy-seven patients with a severe and enduring illness with wide functional impairment took part in the study. Following inpatient care, physical improvement was moderate/good with a large increase in BMI, although most patients continued to have a clinical level of eating disorder symptoms at discharge. The potentially modifiable predictors of outcome included confidence to change, social functioning and carer expressed emotion and control.

conclusionsOverall, the response to inpatient treatment was modest particularly in the group with a severe enduring form of illness. Adolescents had a better response. Although inpatient treatment produces an improvement in physical health there was less improvement in other eating disorder and mood symptoms. As predicted by the carer interpersonal maintenance model, carer behaviour may influence the response to inpatient care, as may improved social functioning and confidence to change.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAnorexia NervosaCohort StudiesFeeding and Eating DisordersFemaleHospitalizationHumansInpatientsMalePatient SatisfactionSelf ConceptTreatment OutcomeUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID24200194
PMCPMC3871017
OpenAlexW1990605599

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.