Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24200103›Full record

ArticleDrug and alcohol dependence2014

Item response theory analyses of DSM-IV and DSM-5 stimulant use disorder criteria in an American Indian community sample.

David A Gilder, Ian R Gizer, Philip Lau, Cindy L Ehlers

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Drug and alcohol dependence, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Assessing measurement bias in substance use disorder criteria associated with childhood adversity and genetic liability.Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Community Awareness of Outreach Efforts to Reduce Underage Drinking on California Indian Reservations.American Indian and Alaska native mental health research (Online) · 2020
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

David A GilderDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Neurosciences The Scripps Research Institute, 10550 North Torrey Pines Road, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA.
Ian R GizerDepartment of Psychological Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211, USA.
Philip LauDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Neurosciences The Scripps Research Institute, 10550 North Torrey Pines Road, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA.
Cindy L EhlersDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Neurosciences The Scripps Research Institute, 10550 North Torrey Pines Road, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA; Department of Molecular and Experimental Medicine, The Scripps Research Institute, 10550 North Torrey Pines Road, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA. Electronic address: cindye@scripps.edu.
Scripps Research Institute · USUniversity of Missouri · US

Funding

Deep sequencing studies for cannabis and stimulant dependenceR01DA030976 · NIDA · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI EHLERS, CINDY L, GELERNTER, JOEL · 2010 to 2014
$16.5M
RISK FACTORS FOR ALCOHOLISM IN NATIVE AMERICANSR37AA010201 · NIAAA · SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE, THE · PI EHLERS, CINDY L · 2007 to 2015
$7.0M
NIAAA NIH HHS R37 AA010201NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA030976
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNative Americans experience some of the highest rates of DSM-IV stimulant dependence (SD) of all U.S. ethnic groups. This report compares DSM-IV and DSM-5 stimulant use disorder (SUD) diagnostic criteria in an American Indian community sample.

methodsDemographic information, stimulant (methamphetamine or cocaine) use, and lifetime DSM-IV and DSM-5 diagnoses were assessed in 858 adult American Indians. Item Response Theory (IRT) analyses were used to assess SUD criteria in both DSM-IV and DSM-5 criteria sets along an underlying latent trait severity continuum and the effect of demographic variables on differential item functioning (DIF) in those criteria.

resultsThe overall rate of DSM-IV SD was 33%, of DSM-IV SUD was 38%, and of DSM-5 SUD was 36% with no gender differences. All SUD symptoms in both the DSM-IV and DSM-5 datasets functioned on the moderate portion of the underlying severity continuum. "Craving" discriminated better than any other criterion at its level of severity in indicating the presence or absence of SUD. There was little DIF in groups defined by gender or any other demographic variable in either the DSM-IV or DSM-5 datasets.

conclusionsThese findings indicate that in this American Indian sample, diagnostic criteria for DSM-IV and DSM-5 SUD function similarly in terms of severity and DIF and that the abolition of the DSM-IV distinction between stimulant abuse and dependence in DSM-5 is warranted.

Indexed as

Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental DisordersAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAmphetamine-Related DisordersCentral Nervous System StimulantsCocaine-Related DisordersFemaleHumansIndians, North AmericanMaleMethamphetamineMiddle AgedResidence CharacteristicsYoung AdultCentral Nervous System StimulantsMethamphetamineAmerican IndiansDSM-5DSM-IVStimulant Use Disorders

Identifiers

PMID24200103
PMCPMC3915779
OpenAlexW2053734916

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.