Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24200084›Full record

ArticleAIDS care2014

HIV testing of male partners of pregnant women in Porto Alegre, Brazil: a potential strategy for reduction of HIV seroconversion during pregnancy.

Nava Yeganeh, Mariana Simon, Claire Dillavou, Ivana Varella, Breno Riegel Santos, Marineide Melo, Rosana Fonseca, Rita Lira, Pamina Gorbach, Karin Nielsen-Saines

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AIDS care, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 45% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Nava Yeganeha Department of Pediatrics, Division of Infectious Disease , David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA , Los Angeles , CA , USA.
Mariana Simon
Claire Dillavou
Ivana Varella
Breno Riegel Santos
Marineide Melo
Rosana Fonseca
Rita Lira
Pamina Gorbach
Karin Nielsen-Saines
Hospital Nossa Senhora da Conceição · BRUCLA Health · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · US

Funding

Virology CoreP30AI028697 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI ANTON, PETER A · 1991 to 2018
$39.9M
Point-of-care telemedicine units for surveillance of infectious diseasesR24TW008811 · FIC · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI NIELSEN, KARIN · 2010 to 2010
$414k
FIC NIH HHS R24 TW008811FIC NIH HHS R24 TW008811-01NIAID NIH HHS 5P30 AI28697NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI028697
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pregnant women have a significantly higher risk of HIV acquisition during gestation than their non-pregnant counterparts due to behavioral and biological factors. Acute seroconversion during gestation results in increased HIV mother-to-child transmission rates and has been identified as a major public health challenge. In order to address potential HIV seroconversion in our pregnant patients, we conducted a prospective cohort study to evaluate the acceptability of offering HIV testing to sexual partners of HIV-negative pregnant women receiving antenatal care at two hospitals in Porto Alegre, Brazil. Over a 14-month study period, HIV-negative pregnant women at two hospital-based clinic sites were encouraged to bring their stable sexual partner for HIV voluntary counseling and testing during prenatal care. Women were re-interviewed following delivery to measure success of the intervention. Of the 1223 HIV-negative pregnant women enrolled in the study, 663 (54%) of their male sexual partners received HIV testing during antenatal care and 4 (0.6%) were diagnosed with HIV infection. A total of 645 women were interviewed at the time of delivery, with 620 (97%) confirming that HIV testing was suggested to their partner. The most common reason provided by women as to why partners did not come for testing was work (69%) and lack of perceived risk (14%). Independent predictors of successful partner testing included being white (odds ratio [OR] 1.59, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.18-2.12), married (OR 1.78, 95% CI 1.08-2.94), having an older age of sexual debut (OR 0.94, 95% CI 0.9-0.98), and being recruited at Hospital Conceiçao (OR 2.1, 95% CI 1.52-2.88). We conclude that HIV partner testing during prenatal care is acceptable, rendering this intervention attractive to public health programs targeting prevention of sexually transmitted infections.

Indexed as

Pregnant PeopleSexual PartnersAdultBrazilFemaleHIV InfectionsHIV SeropositivityHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMass ScreeningPregnancyPregnancy Complications, InfectiousPrenatal CareProspective StudiesRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID24200084
PMCPMC4230890
OpenAlexW2054305263

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.