Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24199820›Full record

ArticleThe neuroradiology journal2013

Effect of the central canal in the spinal cord on fluid movement within the cord.

Ida N Drøsdal, Kent-Andre Mardal, Karen Støverud, Victor Haughton

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The neuroradiology journal, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Spinal fluid biomechanics and imaging: an update for neuroradiologists.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2014
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ida N DrøsdalDNV Software, Veritasveien; Høvik, Norway - vmhaughton@wisc.edu.
Kent-Andre Mardal
Karen Støverud
Victor Haughton

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Computational studies are used to demonstrate the effect of oscillating CSF flow on pressures within the spinal cord. We tested the hypothesis that the central canal in the spinal cord affects spinal cord pressure gradients resulting from oscillatory CSF flow. Two computational models of the spinal cord were created with the same dimensions. Model 1 had a homogeneous porous structure. Model 2 had the same structure with the addition of a central fluid filled space, representing the central canal of the cord. We simulated oscillatory flow in the fluid space using standard computational fluid dynamics tools. For all phases of the CSF flow cycle and for specific projections through the model we calculated pressure gradients and fluid movement in the cord models. Pressures in the models varied through the flow cycle. Model 1 had linearly varying pressure along its long axis that varied with the cycle and had no pressure gradients across the cord. Model 2 had nonlinear varying pressure along its long axis varying with the time in the cycle and had transient centrifugal and centripetal pressure gradients with a central fluid space. The radial pressures varied linearly with distance from the fluid space. Centrifugal and centripetal pressure gradients resulted in radially directed fluid flow in the cord. The central canal within the spinal cord alters the pressure fields occurring during oscillatory CSF flow and creates centrifugal and centripetal fluid flux in the cord.

Indexed as

Models, NeurologicalCerebrospinal FluidComputer SimulationHumansHydrodynamicsSpinal Cordcomputational fluid dynamicsfluid movementspinal cordsyringomyelia

Identifiers

PMID24199820
PMCPMC4202823

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.