Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24199634›Full record

ArticleTissue engineering. Part C, Methods2014

Micro-computed tomography-based three-dimensional kinematic analysis during lateral bending for spinal fusion assessment in a rat posterolateral lumbar fusion model.

Tomonori Yamaguchi, Nozomu Inoue, Robert L Sah, Yu-Po Lee, Alexander P Taborek, Gregory M Williams, Timothy A Moseley, Won C Bae, Koichi Masuda

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tissue engineering. Part C, Methods, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Three-dimensional micro-computed tomography analysis for spinal instability after lumbar facetectomy in the rat.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2017
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Tomonori Yamaguchi1 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, School of Medicine, University of California , San Diego, La Jolla, California.
Nozomu Inoue
Robert L Sah
Yu-Po Lee
Alexander P Taborek
Gregory M Williams
Timothy A Moseley
Won C Bae
Koichi Masuda
University of California System · USNuVasive (United States) · USDoshisha University · JPRush University Medical Center · USUniversity of San Diego · US

Funding

TISSUE ACQUISITION, MORPHOLOGY, AND CELL CULTUREP01AG007996 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN DIEGO · PI SAH, ROBERT L · 1989 to 2016
$26.0M
NIA NIH HHS P01 AG007996
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rat posterolateral lumbar fusion (PLF) models have been used to assess the safety and effectiveness of new bone substitutes and osteoinductive growth factors using palpation, radiography, micro-computed tomography (μCT), and histology as standard methods to evaluate spinal fusion. Despite increased numbers of PLF studies involving alternative bone substitutes and growth factors, the quantitative assessment of treatment efficacy during spinal motion has been limited. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of spinal fusion on lumbar spine segment stability during lateral bending using a μCT-based three-dimensional (3D) kinematic analysis in the rat PLF model. Fourteen athymic male rats underwent PLF surgery at L4/5 and received bone grafts harvested from the ilium and femurs of syngeneic rats (Isograft, n=7) or no graft (Sham, n=7). At 8 weeks after the PLF surgery, spinal fusion was assessed by manual palpation, plain radiography, μCT, and histology. To determine lumbar segmental motions at the operated level during lateral bending, 3D kinematic analysis was performed. The Isograft group, but not the Sham group, showed spinal fusion on manual palpation (6/7), solid fusion mass in radiographs (6/7), as well as bone bridging in μCT and histological images (5/7). Compared to the Sham group, the Isograft group revealed limited 3D lateral bending angular range of motion and lateral translation during lateral bending at the fused segment where disc height narrowing was observed. This μCT-based 3D kinematic analysis can provide a quantitative assessment of spinal fusion in a rat PLF model to complement current gold standard methods used for efficacy assessment of new therapeutic approaches.

Indexed as

Bone TransplantationFemurIliumSpinal FusionX-Ray MicrotomographyAnimalsIsograftsLumbosacral RegionMaleRange of Motion, ArticularRatsRats, Nude

Identifiers

PMID24199634
PMCPMC4074752
OpenAlexW2329338530

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.