ArticleNI 2012 : 11th International Congress on Nursing Informatics, June 23-27, 2012, Montreal, Canada. International Congress in Nursing Informatics (11th : 2012 : Montreal, Quebec)2012
Developing a conceptual map of patient information needs in prostate cancer screening.
Article in NI 2012 : 11th International Congress on Nursing Informatics, June 23-27, 2012, Montreal, Canada. International Congress in Nursing Informatics (11th : 2012 : Montreal, Quebec), 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
As the prevalence of shared decision-making increases as part of the patient-clinician relationship, patient needs for information become critical aspects of preventative care and treatment decisions. It has been shown that patients who have relevant information about healthcare options make choices and decisions which are more consistent with their personal values. This is especially useful when considering the various options regarding prostate cancer screening, (PCS). PCS remains extremely controversial given the uncertainty and lack of conclusive scientific evidence regarding the consequences of having the prostate specific antigen (PSA) test. It is vital that men are fully informed of the possible ramifications of the PSA test. The purpose of this study was to identify the information needs of male patients in PCS situations in primary care medical encounters. A deductive qualitative analysis was applied to uncover reoccurring themes and critical information presented by the subjects during conversations regarding PCS. From this analysis, a preliminary conceptual map was created in order to identify and understand the levels of information needed for patients to make informed PCS decisions. Future use and development of this map may improve PCS decisions by providing a structural approach to understanding the primary issues and implications of PCS for both the patient and clinician.
Identifiers
24199101PMC3799154What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.