Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24199087›Full record

ArticleNI 2012 : 11th International Congress on Nursing Informatics, June 23-27, 2012, Montreal, Canada. International Congress in Nursing Informatics (11th : 2012 : Montreal, Quebec)2012

Development of an observational tool to measure nurses' information needs.

Tiffany F Kelley, Debra Brandon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NI 2012 : 11th International Congress on Nursing Informatics, June 23-27, 2012, Montreal, Canada. International Congress in Nursing Informatics (11th : 2012 : Montreal, Quebec), 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Tiffany F KelleyDuke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Debra Brandon

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nurses collect, communicate and store patient information needed for care through verbal, handwritten and electronic information sources. However, the specific categories of nurses' information needs for the care of hospitalized patients remain unknown. The purpose of this study was to identify the categories of nurses' information needs and develop an observational tool to measure the information needs through available information sources. We analyzed qualitative data from interview transcripts and conducted direct observations of nurses to identify a total of 17 categories of nurses' information needs when caring for hospitalized patients. Once identified, we developed an observational tool to quantitatively measure the category of information need, whether the information need was collected and communicated, and through which information source. Future studies will be able to measure the gathering and communication of information needs through direct observation.

Identifiers

PMID24199087
PMCPMC3799094

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.