Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24199064›Full record

ArticleNI 2012 : 11th International Congress on Nursing Informatics, June 23-27, 2012, Montreal, Canada. International Congress in Nursing Informatics (11th : 2012 : Montreal, Quebec)2012

A framework for harmonizing terminologies to support representation of nursing practice in electronic records.

Patricia C Dykes, Rebecca R Dadamio, Hyeon-Eui Kim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NI 2012 : 11th International Congress on Nursing Informatics, June 23-27, 2012, Montreal, Canada. International Congress in Nursing Informatics (11th : 2012 : Montreal, Quebec), 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Hospital-Based Robotic Applications in Nursing Practice: A Scoping Review.Journal of nursing scholarship : an official publication of Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Patricia C DykesCenter for Nursing Excellence, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA ; Department General Internal Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA.
Rebecca R Dadamio
Hyeon-Eui Kim

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nursing terminology development efforts in the United States and globally provide concept coverage across many domains of nursing practice. Efforts to integrate concepts from across terminology systems into a single reference terminology support broad concept coverage but do not provide a means to leverage the full benefits of the individual terminology systems. The purpose of this paper is to explore the feasibility of harmonizing the 198 Clinical Care Classification (CCC) System core intervention concepts with intervention concepts in the International Classification for Nursing Practice (ICNP®) as a means to leverage both the information model components of the CCC system and the broad concept coverage of the ICNP®. Findings suggest that the CCC system and ICNP® are largely interoperable and a common framework underlying the two terminology systems provides a foundation for harmonization.

Identifiers

PMID24199064
PMCPMC3799155

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.