Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24199032›Full record

ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2013

Signal-to-Noise Ratios for Structural and Functional Tests in Glaucoma.

Stuart K Gardiner, Brad Fortune, Shaban Demirel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Stuart K GardinerDevers Eye Institute, Legacy Health, Portland, OR.
Brad Fortune
Shaban Demirel

Funding

Functional Testing for GlaucomaR01EY020922 · NEI · LEGACY EMANUEL HOSPITAL AND HEALTH CENTER · PI GARDINER, STUART · 2011 to 2021
$3.2M
Predicting the rate of progression in glaucomaR01EY019674 · NEI · LEGACY EMANUEL HOSPITAL AND HEALTH CENTER · PI DEMIREL, SHABAN · 2009 to 2013
$1.8M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY019674NEI NIH HHS R01 EY020922
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeStandard automated perimetry (SAP) demonstrates high variability. Structural tests such as optical coherence tomography (OCT) may be more repeatable. However, comparisons of their ability to detect glaucomatous change are challenging due to different units and dynamic ranges. This study demonstrates a signal-to-noise analysis to perform comparisons within a common framework.

methodsLongitudinal data were used from 226 eyes of 130 subjects with nonendstage glaucoma (mean deviation [MD] from -19.50 to 2.89 dB). Subjects were tested twice a year for a total of at least six visits. For each eye, MD from SAP and average retinal nerve fiber layer thickness (RNFLT) from OCT were regressed linearly against time. 'Signal' was defined as the rate of change over time, while 'noise' was defined as the SD of residuals from this trend. Individual longitudinal signal-to-noise ratios were calculated. A summary quantification was also calculated, using the 10th percentile of these rates within the cohort as signal and the SD of residuals pooled across all eyes as noise.

resultsIndividual signal-to-noise ratios were significantly better for OCT RNFLT than for SAP MD (

conclusionsRNFLT measured by OCT had a better longitudinal signal-to-noise ratio than MD from SAP. TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE: The longitudinal signal-to-noise ratio provides a means to perform a fair comparison between different techniques, which is robust to differences in scale and measurement units. Longitudinal studies in glaucoma should consider reporting signal-to-noise ratios to facilitate interpretation and comparison of results.

Indexed as

glaucomaoptical coherence tomographyperimetrystatistics

Identifiers

PMID24199032
PMCPMC3812901

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.