Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24198609›Full record

ReviewOpen access journal of urology2010

Social, economic, and health utility considerations in the treatment of overactive bladder.

Emilio Sacco, Daniele Tienforti, Alessandro D'Addessi, Francesco Pinto, Marco Racioppi, Angelo Totaro, Daniele D'Agostino, Francesco Marangi, Pierfrancesco Bassi

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Open access journal of urology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02701010 (Comparative Effectiveness of Three Different Teaching Methods in Behavioural Therapy Program for Female Overactive Bladder), which is not on this map. Cited by 27 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02701010 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2012, after this paper: background citation

Comparative Effectiveness of Three Different Teaching Methods in Behavioural Therapy Program for Female Overactive Bladder: A Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorSaglik Bilimleri Universitesi Gulhane Tip FakultesiRan2012 to 2013Enrolled60ConditionsUrinary Bladder, OveractiveArmsStructured training and leaflet, Structured training, Leaflet, Control Group
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Observational
  9. Effects ofFood science & nutrition · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Pharmacological Management of Urinary Incontinence: Current and Emerging Treatment.Clinical pharmacology : advances and applications · 2021
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Emilio SaccoUrologic Clinic, Department of Surgery, "Agostino Gemelli" Hospital, Catholic University Medical School, Rome, Italy.
Daniele Tienforti
Alessandro D'Addessi
Francesco Pinto
Marco Racioppi
Angelo Totaro
Daniele D'Agostino
Francesco Marangi
Pierfrancesco Bassi
Agostino Gemelli University Polyclinic · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Overactive bladder (OAB) is a highly prevalent urinary syndrome with a profound impact on quality of life (QoL) of affected patients and their family because of its adverse effects on social, sexual, interpersonal, and professional function. Cost-of-illness analyses showed the huge economic burden related to OAB for patients, public healthcare systems, and society, secondary to both direct and indirect costs; however, intangible costs related to QoL impact are usually omitted from these analyses. Recently many novel treatment modalities have been introduced and the need to apply the modern methodology of health technology assessment to these treatment strategies was immediately clear in order to evaluate objectively their value in term of both improvement in length/quality of life and costs. Health utilities are instruments that allow a measurement of QoL and its integration in the economic evaluation using the quality-adjusted life-years model and cost-utility analysis. The development of suitable instruments for quantifying utility in the specific group of OAB patients is vitally important to extend the application of cost-utility analysis in OAB and to guide healthcare resources allocation for this disorder. Studies are required to define the cost-effectiveness of available pharmacological and nonpharmacological therapy options for this disorder.

Indexed as

burdencost-utilityhealth utilityoveractive bladder

Identifiers

PMID24198609
PMCPMC3818873
OpenAlexW2007982310

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.