ArticleStem cells and cloning : advances and applications2011
Age and sex differences in neural stem cell transplantation: a descriptive study in rats.
Article in Stem cells and cloning : advances and applications, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Therapeutic Transplantation of Human Central Nervous System Organoids for Neural Reconstruction.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- The impact of recipient age on the effects of umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells on HBV-related acute-on-chronic liver failure and liver cirrhosis.Stem cell research & therapy · 2021Observational
- Dental Pulp Tissue Engineering Using Mesenchymal Stem Cells: a Review with a Protocol.Stem cell reviews and reports · 2018Review
- Adult stem cell transplantation: is gender a factor in stemness?International journal of molecular sciences · 2014Review
- The battle of the sexes for stroke therapy: female- versus male-derived stem cells.CNS & neurological disorders drug targets · 2013Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe purpose of this study was to determine whether neural stem cell (NSC) sexual dimorphism previously demonstrated in vitro translates in vivo in NSC transplantation experiments and constitutes a defining factor of the transplantation outcome.
methodsNSCs isolated from the subventricular zone of 2-day-old or 20-month-old male and female rats were grown as neurospheres prior to being transplanted in the striatum of 2-day-old or 20-month-old male and female recipient animals. The outcome of the transplantation and the NSC differentiation status were analyzed 8 weeks later by assessing the expression of the markers doublecortin (DCX) for neuroblasts, glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) for astrocytes, nestin for stem cells, and choline acetyltransferase (ChAT) for neuronal cholinergic phenotype by immunofluorescence.
resultsNo NSCs were detected in the brain of rat pups 8 weeks after transplantation. However, the endogenous neurogenesis was dramatically increased in a sex-dependent manner. These data suggest that the transplanted NSCs may have triggered endogenous neurogenesis by the intermediate growth factors they may have produced or the production they may have induced. However, NSCs transplanted into the striatum of adult rats were detectable at week 8. NSC survival was dependent on the sex and age of the donor and the recipient. Some of the transplanted cells were found to express DCX, GFAP, and ChAT, supporting an ongoing differentiation process toward astroglial and neuronal cholinergic phenotypes.
conclusionThe outcome of the NSC transplantation was highly dependent on the sex and age of the combination donor/recipient. Data generated from our work may allow us in the future to answer the question "What NSCs and for whom?" and consequently lead to the optimization of the grafting process and improvement of the clinical prognosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.