Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24198460›Full record

ReviewNanotechnology, science and applications2008

Gold nanoparticles: From nanomedicine to nanosensing.

Po C Chen, Sandra C Mwakwari, Adegboyega K Oyelere

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nanotechnology, science and applications, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 68 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
68citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

68 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. RSC advances · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Enhanced Thermo-optical Response by Means of Anapole Excitation.The journal of physical chemistry letters · 2022
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Biologically Derived Gold Nanoparticles and Their Applications.Bioinorganic chemistry and applications · 2022
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Drug Delivery Systems of Natural Products in Oncology.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Review

8 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Po C ChenSchool of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Parker H Petit Institute for Bioengineering and Bioscience, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Sandra C Mwakwari
Adegboyega K Oyelere

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Because of their photo-optical distinctiveness and biocompatibility, gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) have proven to be powerful tools in various nanomedicinal and nanomedical applications. In this review article, we discuss recent advances in the application of AuNPs in diagnostic imaging, biosensing and binary cancer therapeutic techniques. We also provide an eclectic collection of AuNPs delivery strategies, including assorted classes of delivery vehicles, which are showing great promise in specific targeting of AuNPs to diseased tissues. However, successful clinical implementations of the promised applications of AuNPs are still hampered by many barriers. In particular, more still needs to be done regarding our understanding of the pharmacokinetics and toxicological profiles of AuNPs and AuNPs-conjugates.

Indexed as

bioimagingbiosensinggold nanoparticles (AuNPs)near infrared (NIR)photothermal therapyreceptor-mediated endocytosis (RME)surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS)surface plasmon resonance (SPR)targeted delivery

Identifiers

PMID24198460
PMCPMC3781743

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.