Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24198326›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2014

Dynamics and cortical distribution of neural responses to 2D and 3D motion in human.

Benoit R Cottereau, Suzanne P McKee, Anthony M Norcia

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Asymmetries between achromatic and chromatic extraction of 3D motion signals.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
  6. Visuomotor Correlates of Conflict Expectation in the Context of Motor Decisions.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2018
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Benoit R CottereauCentre de Recherche Cerveau et Cognition, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique CERCO UMR 5549, Toulouse, France;
Suzanne P McKee
Anthony M Norcia

Funding

Disparity processing in visual cortexR01EY018875 · NEI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI NORCIA, ANTHONY M · 2008 to 2021
$4.6M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY-018875NEI NIH HHS R01 EY018875
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The perception of motion-in-depth is important for avoiding collisions and for the control of vergence eye-movements and other motor actions. Previous psychophysical studies have suggested that sensitivity to motion-in-depth has a lower temporal processing limit than the perception of lateral motion. The present study used functional MRI-informed EEG source-imaging to study the spatiotemporal properties of the responses to lateral motion and motion-in-depth in human visual cortex. Lateral motion and motion-in-depth displays comprised stimuli whose only difference was interocular phase: monocular oscillatory motion was either in-phase in the two eyes (lateral motion) or in antiphase (motion-in-depth). Spectral analysis was used to break the steady-state visually evoked potentials responses down into even and odd harmonic components within five functionally defined regions of interest: V1, V4, lateral occipital complex, V3A, and hMT+. We also characterized the responses within two anatomically defined regions: the inferior and superior parietal cortex. Even harmonic components dominated the evoked responses and were a factor of approximately two larger for lateral motion than motion-in-depth. These responses were slower for motion-in-depth and were largely independent of absolute disparity. In each of our regions of interest, responses at odd-harmonics were relatively small, but were larger for motion-in-depth than lateral motion, especially in parietal cortex, and depended on absolute disparity. Taken together, our results suggest a plausible neural basis for reduced psychophysical sensitivity to rapid motion-in-depth.

Indexed as

Brain MappingDepth PerceptionEvoked Potentials, VisualMotion PerceptionAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeuronsVisual Cortex3Dhigh-density EEGstereomotionvision

Identifiers

PMID24198326
PMCPMC3921412

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.