ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2014
Dynamics and cortical distribution of neural responses to 2D and 3D motion in human.
Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparison of tripolar and traditional EEG recording of the visual evoked potential.Vision research · 2025Article
- Visual-spatial dimension integration in digital pathology education enhances anatomical pathology learning.BMC medical education · 2022Article
- Decoding Neural Responses to Motion-in-Depth Using EEG.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2020Article
- Antero-Posterior vs. Lateral Vestibular Input Processing in Human Visual Cortex.Frontiers in integrative neuroscience · 2020Article
- Asymmetries between achromatic and chromatic extraction of 3D motion signals.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019Article
- Visuomotor Correlates of Conflict Expectation in the Context of Motor Decisions.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2018Article
- Using Functional Near Infrared Spectroscopy (fNIRS) to Study Dynamic Stereoscopic Depth Perception.Brain topography · 2016Article
- Learning the 3-D structure of objects from 2-D views depends on shape, not format.Journal of vision · 2016Article
- Aesthetic preference recognition of 3D shapes using EEG.Cognitive neurodynamics · 2016Article
- Article
- How to use fMRI functional localizers to improve EEG/MEG source estimation.Journal of neuroscience methods · 2015Review
- The steady-state visual evoked potential in vision research: A review.Journal of vision · 2015Review
- Vergence eye movements in patients with schizophrenia.Vision research · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The perception of motion-in-depth is important for avoiding collisions and for the control of vergence eye-movements and other motor actions. Previous psychophysical studies have suggested that sensitivity to motion-in-depth has a lower temporal processing limit than the perception of lateral motion. The present study used functional MRI-informed EEG source-imaging to study the spatiotemporal properties of the responses to lateral motion and motion-in-depth in human visual cortex. Lateral motion and motion-in-depth displays comprised stimuli whose only difference was interocular phase: monocular oscillatory motion was either in-phase in the two eyes (lateral motion) or in antiphase (motion-in-depth). Spectral analysis was used to break the steady-state visually evoked potentials responses down into even and odd harmonic components within five functionally defined regions of interest: V1, V4, lateral occipital complex, V3A, and hMT+. We also characterized the responses within two anatomically defined regions: the inferior and superior parietal cortex. Even harmonic components dominated the evoked responses and were a factor of approximately two larger for lateral motion than motion-in-depth. These responses were slower for motion-in-depth and were largely independent of absolute disparity. In each of our regions of interest, responses at odd-harmonics were relatively small, but were larger for motion-in-depth than lateral motion, especially in parietal cortex, and depended on absolute disparity. Taken together, our results suggest a plausible neural basis for reduced psychophysical sensitivity to rapid motion-in-depth.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.