Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24198277›Full record

ArticleDevelopment (Cambridge, England)2013

zebraflash transgenic lines for in vivo bioluminescence imaging of stem cells and regeneration in adult zebrafish.

Chen-Hui Chen, Ellen Durand, Jinhu Wang, Leonard I Zon, Kenneth D Poss

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Development (Cambridge, England), 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Harnessing the regenerative potential ofbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. ptx3aCell reports · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Visualization of regenerating and repairing hearts.Clinical science (London, England : 1979) · 2022
    Article
  15. Identification of Individual Zebrafish (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Regeneration Genetics.Annual review of genetics · 2017
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Chen-Hui ChenDepartment of Cell Biology and Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
Ellen Durand
Jinhu Wang
Leonard I Zon
Kenneth D Poss
Duke Medical Center · USHoward Hughes Medical Institute · US

Funding

CORE--ZEBRAFISHP30DK049216 · NIDDK · CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL BOSTON · PI ZHOU, YI · 1999 to 2015
$14.3M
Regulation of Myocardial Regeneration in ZebrafishR01HL081674 · NHLBI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI POSS, KENNETH D · 2005 to 2019
$6.6M
EMBRYONIC HEMATOPOIESISR01HL048801 · NHLBI · CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL BOSTON · PI ZON, LEONARD IRA · 1992 to 2016
$5.7M
Regulation of Appendage Regeneration in ZebrafishR01GM074057 · NIGMS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI POSS, KENNETH D · 2006 to 2017
$3.7M
NHLBI NIH HHS HL081674NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL048801NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL081674NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK049216NIGMS NIH HHS GM074057NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM074057
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The zebrafish has become a standard model system for stem cell and tissue regeneration research, based on powerful genetics, high tissue regenerative capacity and low maintenance costs. Yet, these studies can be challenged by current limitations of tissue visualization techniques in adult animals. Here we describe new imaging methodology and present several ubiquitous and tissue-specific luciferase-based transgenic lines, which we have termed zebraflash, that facilitate the assessment of regeneration and engraftment in freely moving adult zebrafish. We show that luciferase-based live imaging reliably estimates muscle quantity in an internal organ, the heart, and can longitudinally follow cardiac regeneration in individual animals after major injury. Furthermore, luciferase-based detection enables visualization and quantification of engraftment in live recipients of transplanted hematopoietic stem cell progeny, with advantages in sensitivity and gross spatial resolution over fluorescence detection. Our findings present a versatile resource for monitoring and dissecting vertebrate stem cell and regeneration biology.

Indexed as

Cardiac Imaging TechniquesAnimalsAnimals, Genetically ModifiedCell ProliferationEmbryo, NonmammalianFluorescent DyesGuided Tissue RegenerationHeartHematopoietic Stem CellsHematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationLuciferasesLuminescent MeasurementsMyocardiumRegenerationZebrafishFluorescent DyesLuciferasesHeart regenerationLive imagingLuciferaseRegenerationStem cellsZebrafish

Identifiers

PMID24198277
PMCPMC3848191
OpenAlexW2095985303

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.