ArticleMolecular biotechnology2014
Fidelity and representativeness of two isothermal multiple displacement amplification systems to preamplify limiting amounts of total RNA.
Article in Molecular biotechnology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Isothermal multiple displacement amplification: a methodical approach enhancing molecular routine diagnostics of microcarcinomas and small biopsies.OncoTargets and therapy · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this study we investigated the fidelity and representativeness of two novel multiple displacement amplification (MDA) protocols leading to whole transcriptome amplification (WTA). WTA is used to amplify a limiting amount of experimental RNA, allowing its use in downstream applications. Using Phi29 and Bst DNA polymerase-based MDA, henceforth referred to as WTA-Phi and WTA-Bst, respectively, we successfully amplified very low amounts of linearly concatenated cDNA originating from 10 to 100 ng of starting RNA. The average yield obtained from 10 ng was 3.5 and 4.7 μg for WTA-Phi and WTA-Bst, respectively, while 100 ng of starting RNA yielded 7.0 and 12.4 μg for WTA-Phi and WTA-Bst, respectively. Representational distortion of the templates, analyzed via conventional PCR, showed robust amplification of 11 different transcripts when either WTA-Phi or WTA-Bst synthesized templates were used, while some transcripts were not detected from unamplified templates. Loci representation, a measure of amplification consistency, was evaluated using TaqMan RT-qPCR amplification of five different transcripts, yielding values ranging from 96.4 to 189.3 %, comparable to those obtained using genomic target-based MDA systems. The two MDA protocols described in this study efficiently lead to representative WTA, using as little as 10 ng of starting RNA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
24198216What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.