ArticleClinical and vaccine immunology : CVI2014
Identification and characterization of intestinal antigen-presenting cells involved in uptake and processing of a nontoxic recombinant chimeric mucosal immunogen based on cholera toxin using imaging flow cytometry.
Article in Clinical and vaccine immunology : CVI, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Adherent Intestinal Cells From Atlantic Salmon Show Phagocytic Ability and Express Macrophage-Specific Genes.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2020Article
- Analysis of procoagulant phosphatidylserine-exposing platelets by imaging flow cytometry.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2018Article
- Identification of a supramolecular functional architecture of Streptococcus mutans adhesin P1 on the bacterial cell surface.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2015Article
- Binding forces of Streptococcus mutans P1 adhesin.ACS nano · 2015Article
- Flow cytometry and solid organ transplantation: a perfect match.Immunological investigations · 2014Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Intragastric immunization with recombinant chimeric immunogen, SBR-CTA2/B, constructed from the saliva-binding region (SBR) of Streptococcus mutans antigen AgI/II and the A2/B subunits of cholera toxin (CT) induces salivary and circulating antibodies against S. mutans that protect against dental caries. We previously found that SBR-CTA2/B activated dendritic cells (DC) in the Peyer's patches (PP) and mesenteric lymph nodes (MLN). To identify the cells involved in the intestinal uptake of SBR-CTA2/B and the initiation of immune responses, mice were immunized intragastrically with fluorescein-labeled SBR-CTA2/B or SBR, and intestinal cells were examined by imaging flow cytometry after fluorescent staining for cell surface markers. SBR-CTA2/B was preferentially taken up by CD103(+) DC in the PP and by both CD103(+) and CD11c(+) DC in intestinal lamina propria (LP), whereas SBR was taken up to a lesser extent by PP CD11c(+) DC, within 2 to 16 h. By 16 h, CD103(+) and CD11c(+) DC containing fluorescein-labeled SBR-CTA2/B were found in MLN and showed upregulation of the chemokine receptor CCR7. Large numbers of SBR-CTA2/B-containing DC were found interacting with CD4(+) (T helper) cells, which costained for nuclear transcription factors T-bet or RORγt, identifying them as Th1 or Th17 cells. In contrast, SBR-containing CD11c(+) DC interacted preferentially with GATA3(+) (Th2) cells. No SBR- or SBR-CTA2/B-containing DC were found interacting with Foxp3(+) (T regulatory) cells. We conclude that the coupling of SBR to CTA2/B enhances its immunogenicity by promoting uptake by DC in both PP and LP and that these antigen-containing DC migrated to MLN and interacted preferentially with Th1 and Th17 cells to induce active immune responses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.