ArticleEndocrine2014
Hyperhomocysteinemia is an independent predictor of sub-clinical carotid vascular damage in subjects with grade-1 hypertension.
Article in Endocrine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Chronic lifestyle diseases display seasonal sensitive comorbid trend in human population evidence from Google Trends.PloS one · 2018Article
- Toll-like receptor 4 mediates vascular remodeling in hyperhomocysteinemia.Molecular and cellular biochemistry · 2017Review
- Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase gene A1298C polymorphism and gene-environment interactions are associated with carotid plaque in a south Chinese population.International journal of clinical and experimental pathology · 2017Article
- Toll-like receptor 4 mutation suppresses hyperhomocysteinemia-induced hypertension.American journal of physiology. Cell physiology · 2016Article
- Hyperhomocysteinemia independently associated with the risk of hypertension: a cross-sectional study from rural China.Journal of human hypertension · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although the role of homocysteinemia (Hcy) as a coronary risk factor (RF) has been scaled down, hyper-Hcy and carotid vascular damage (CVD) are still considered as RFs for cerebrovascular events. In 276 grade-1 hypertensives (160 men and 116 women aged 59.6 ± 15.0 years) without known cardiovascular disease and having hyper-Hcy (≥15 μM/L), subclinical CVD was evaluated by ultrasonographic carotid-wall intima media thickness (IMT). Hcy was divided into quartiles and C667→T polymorphism codifying for methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) was determined. According to the genotype, subjects were divided into CC (wild), CT (heterozygote) and TT (homozygous mutation). Differences between continuous variables were evaluated by analysis of variance, while gender specific odds ratio (OR) and 95 % confidence intervals (CI) of CVD (IMT >0.9 mm or plaque) were calculated by multivariate logistic regression analysis. Blood pressure (BP) values were not different across the quartiles of Hcy. In 46.4 % of cases, sub-clinical CVD was found, with a prevalence increasingly distributed in the quartiles of Hcy (31.9, 42, 52.2, 59.4 %, p < 0.001). Prevalence of TT allele of the MTHFR genotype was also significantly distributed in the quartiles of Hcy (13.6, 12.3, 23.5 and 50.6 %, p < 0.0001), whereas no relationship was found between genotype and CVD. The last quartile of Hcy predicted CVD (OR 1.32, CI 1.12-2.2, p = 0.02) independent of age (OR 1.23, CI 1.002-1.56, p = 0.0001), systolic BP (OR 1.52, CI 1.24-2.10), diabetes (OR 2.11, CI 1:32-2.88, p = 0.01) and smoking (OR 1.45, CI 1.14-1.98, p = 0.04). Adding gender did not modify the model. In hypertensives, Hcy values >36.5 μM/L independently predict CVD and in those who are also diabetic and smokers, Hcy assessment without MTHFR genotype should be recommended to obtain a better stratification of global cerebrovascular risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
24197804What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.