Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24197518›Full record

Trial reportLasers in medical science2015

Comparative clinical study of light analgesic effect on temporomandibular disorder (TMD) using red and infrared led therapy.

Vitor Hugo Panhoca, Rosane de Fatima Zanirato Lizarelli, Silvia Cristina Nunez, Renata Campi de Andrade Pizzo, Clovis Grecco, Fernanda Rossi Paolillo, Vanderlei Salvador Bagnato

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Lasers in medical science, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 70 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Evaluation the effects of low-level laser therapy on disc displacement with reduction.Turkish journal of physical medicine and rehabilitation · 2020
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Photobiomodulation: lasers vs. light emitting diodes?Photochemical & photobiological sciences : Official journal of the European Photochemistry Association and the European Society for Photobiology · 2018
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Vitor Hugo PanhocaOptics Group from Physics Institute of São Carlos (IFSC), University of São Paulo (USP), Brazil. Av. Trabalhador Sancarlense, 400-Centro, 13560-970, São Carlos, SP, Brazil, vhpanhoca@msn.com.
Rosane de Fatima Zanirato Lizarelli
Silvia Cristina Nunez
Renata Campi de Andrade Pizzo
Clovis Grecco
Fernanda Rossi Paolillo
Vanderlei Salvador Bagnato
Universidade de São Paulo · BRUniversidade Federal de São Carlos · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Low-level laser therapy (LLLT) has been widely applied in pain relief in several clinical situations, including temporomandibular disorders (TMD). However, the effects of LED therapy on TMD has not been investigated. This study aims to evaluate the effects of red and infrared LEDs on: (1) tissue temperature in ex vivo and (2) pain relief and mandibular range of motion in patients with TMD. Thirty patients between 18 and 40 years old were included and randomly assigned to three groups. The two experimental groups were: the red LED (630 ± 10 nm) group and the infrared LED (850 ± 10 nm) group. The irradiation parameters were 150 mW, 300 mW/cm(2), 18 J/cm(2), and 9 J/point. The positive control group received an infrared laser (780 nm) with 70 mW, 1.7 W/cm(2), 105 J/cm(2), and 4.2 J/point. LED and laser therapies were applied bilaterally to the face for 60 s/point. Five points were irradiated: three points around the temporomandibular joint (TMJ), one point for the temporalis, and one near the masseter. Eight sessions of phototherapy were performed, twice a week for 4 weeks. Pain induced by palpating the masseter muscle and mandibular range of motion (maximum oral aperture) were measured at baseline, immediately after treatment, 7 days after treatment, and 30 days after treatment. There was an increase in tissue temperature during both the red and the infrared LED irradiation in ex vivo. There was a significant reduction of pain and increase of the maximum oral aperture for all groups (p ≥ 0.05). There was no significant difference in pain scores and maximum oral aperture between groups at baseline or any periods after treatment (p ≥ 0.05). The current study showed that red and infrared LED therapy can be useful in improving outcomes related to pain relief and orofacial function for TMD patients. We conclude that LED devices constitute an attractive alternative for LLLT.

Indexed as

Low-Level Light TherapyAdolescentAdultAnalgesicsCross-Sectional StudiesFaceFemaleHumansInfrared RaysLongitudinal StudiesMaleMandiblePain ManagementPain MeasurementPhototherapyRange of Motion, ArticularAnalgesics

Identifiers

PMID24197518
OpenAlexW1987809348

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.