Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24197130›Full record

ArticleCancer research2014

Doxorubicin eliminates myeloid-derived suppressor cells and enhances the efficacy of adoptive T-cell transfer in breast cancer.

Darya Alizadeh, Malika Trad, Neale T Hanke, Claire B Larmonier, Nona Janikashvili, Bernard Bonnotte, Emmanuel Katsanis, Nicolas Larmonier

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer research, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 245 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
245citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
11.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

245 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 400 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review

185 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Darya AlizadehAuthors' Affiliations: Cancer Biology Graduate Program; Arizona Cancer Center; Department of Pediatrics, College of Medicine; Department of Immunobiology, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona; Faculty of Medicine, Dijon, and INSERM UMR 1098, Besancon; and Service de Médecine Interne et Immunologie Clinique, CHU Bocage, Dijon, France.
Malika Trad
Neale T Hanke
Claire B Larmonier
Nona Janikashvili
Bernard Bonnotte
Emmanuel Katsanis
Nicolas Larmonier
University of Arizona · USInserm · FR

Funding

VITAMIN AP30CA023074 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA · PI Dan Theodorescu · 1985 to 2026
$110.2M
Integrative Cancer Scholars Training GrantT32CA009213 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA · PI CAREW, JENNIFER S, CURIEL-LEWANDROWSKI, CLARA · 1985 to 2024
$8.6M
Immunotherapy for Chronic Myelogenous LeukemiaR01CA104926 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA · PI KATSANIS, EMMANUEL · 2004 to 2013
$2.4M
NCI NIH HHS CA023074NCI NIH HHS P30 CA023074NCI NIH HHS R01 CA104926NCI NIH HHS R01CA104926NCI NIH HHS T32 CA009213NCI NIH HHS T32CA009213
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSC) expand in tumor-bearing hosts and play a central role in cancer immune evasion by inhibiting adaptive and innate immunity. They therefore represent a major obstacle for successful cancer immunotherapy. Different strategies have thus been explored to deplete and/or inactivate MDSC in vivo. Using a murine mammary cancer model, we demonstrated that doxorubicin selectively eliminates MDSC in the spleen, blood, and tumor beds. Furthermore, residual MDSC from doxorubicin-treated mice exhibited impaired suppressive function. Importantly, the frequency of CD4(+) and CD8(+) T lymphocytes and consequently the effector lymphocytes or natural killer (NK) to suppressive MDSC ratios were significantly increased following doxorubicin treatment of tumor-bearing mice. In addition, the proportion of NK and cytotoxic T cell (CTL) expressing perforin and granzyme B and of CTL producing IFN-γ was augmented by doxorubicin administration. Of therapeutic relevance, this drug efficiently combined with Th1 or Th17 lymphocytes to suppress tumor development and metastatic disease. MDSC isolated from patients with different types of cancer were also sensitive to doxorubicin-mediated cytotoxicity in vitro. These results thus indicate that doxorubicin may be used not only as a direct cytotoxic drug against tumor cells, but also as a potent immunomodulatory agent that selectively impairs MDSC-induced immunosuppression, thereby fostering the efficacy of T-cell-based immunotherapy.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntibiotics, AntineoplasticBreast NeoplasmsCell Line, TumorDoxorubicinFemaleHumansImmunotherapy, AdoptiveMiceMice, Inbred BALB CMice, Inbred C57BLMyeloid CellsT-Lymphocytes, CytotoxicAntibiotics, AntineoplasticDoxorubicin

Identifiers

PMID24197130
PMCPMC3896092
OpenAlexW2143145234

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.