Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24196917›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2014

FDG and FDG-labelled leucocyte PET/CT in the imaging of prosthetic joint infection.

Sabire Yılmaz Aksoy, Sertac Asa, Meftune Ozhan, Meltem Ocak, M Sait Sager, Melih Engin Erkan, Metin Halac, Levent Kabasakal, Kerim Sönmezoglu, Bedii Kanmaz

Open access · greenAbstract readEvaluation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
7.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 68 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. [EJNMMI research · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Biodistribution and dosimetry ofMedical physics · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Direct Cell Radiolabeling forChemical reviews · 2022
    Review
  12. Application ofBone & joint research · 2022
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Nuclear Imaging of Bacterial Infection: The State of the Art and Future Directions.Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2020
    Review
  18. Article
  19. 18F FDG-PET/CT has poor diagnostic accuracy in diagnosing shoulder PJI.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2019
    Article
  20. Diagnostic Performance of PET or PET/CT UsingDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sabire Yılmaz AksoyDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty, University of Istanbul, Aksaray, Istanbul, Turkey, sbr_ylmz@yahoo.com.
Sertac Asa
Meftune Ozhan
Meltem Ocak
M Sait Sager
Melih Engin Erkan
Metin Halac
Levent Kabasakal
Kerim Sönmezoglu
Bedii Kanmaz
Istanbul University · TRDüzce Üniversitesi · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe demand for arthroplasty is rapidly growing as a result of the ageing of the population. Although complications such as heterotrophic ossification, fracture and dislocation are relatively rare, differentiating aseptic loosening, the most common complication of arthroplasty from infection, is a major challenge for clinicians. Radionuclide imaging is currently the imaging modality of choice since it is not affected by orthopaedic hardware. Whereas FDG PET/CT imaging has been widely used in periprosthetic infection, it cannot discriminate aseptic from septic inflammation. In this study we aimed to evaluate the role of FDG PET/CT and FDG-labelled leucocyte PET/CT in the diagnosis of periprosthetic infection.

methodsOf 54 patients with painful joint arthroplasty who were imaged by FDG PET/CT for diagnosis of periprosthetic infection examined, 46 (36 women, 10 men; mean age 61.04 ± 12.2 years, range 32-89 years) with 54 painful joint prostheses (19 hip, 35 knee) with grade 2 (above liver uptake) FDG accumulation on FDG PET/CT were included in the study and these 46 patients also underwent FDG-labelled leucocyte PET/CT. Final diagnoses were made by histopathological-microbiological culture or clinical follow-up.

resultsThe final diagnosis showed infection in 15 (28%) and aseptic loosening in 39 (72%) of the 54 prostheses. FDG PET/CT was found to have a positive predictive value of 28% (15/54). Since patients with no FDG uptake on FDG PET/CT were excluded from the study, the sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value and accuracy could not be calculated. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of FDG-labelled leucocyte PET/CT were 93.3% (14/15), 97.4% (38/39), 93.3% and 97.4%, respectively.

conclusionSince FDG is not specific to infection, the specificity of FDG PET/CT was very low. FDG-labelled leucocyte PET/CT with its high specificity may be a useful method and better than labelled leucocyte scintigraphy in periprosthetic infection imaging.

Indexed as

Fluorodeoxyglucose F18Positron-Emission TomographyRadiopharmaceuticalsTomography, X-Ray ComputedAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansJoint ProsthesisLeukocytesMaleMiddle AgedMultimodal ImagingProsthesis-Related InfectionsSensitivity and SpecificityFluorodeoxyglucose F18Radiopharmaceuticals

Identifiers

PMID24196917
OpenAlexW1974354358

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.